Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Enabling Manual Workplace Optimization Based on Cycle Time and Musculoskeletal Risk Parameters
University of Skövde, School of Engineering Science. University of Skövde, Virtual Engineering Research Environment. (User Centred Product Design (UCPD))ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7232-9353
Solme AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Skövde, School of Engineering Science. University of Skövde, Virtual Engineering Research Environment. (User Centred Product Design (UCPD))ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4596-3815
Scania CV AB, Global Industrial Development, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Processes, E-ISSN 2227-9717, Vol. 12, no 12, article id 2871Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Recently the concept of Industry 5.0 has been introduced, reinforcing the human-centric perspective for future industry. The human-centric scientific discipline and profession ergonomics is applied in industry to find solutions that are optimized in regard to both human well-being and overall system performance. It is found, however, that most production development and preparation work carried out in industry tends to address one of these two domains at a time, in a sequential process, typically making optimization slow and complicated. The aim of this paper is to suggest, demonstrate, and evaluate a concept that makes it possible to optimize aspects of human well-being and overall system performance in an efficient and easy parallel process. The concept enables production planning and balancing of human work in terms of two parameters: assembly time as a parameter of productivity (system performance), and risk of musculoskeletal disorders as a parameter of human well-being. A software demonstrator was developed, and results from thirteen test subjects were compared with the traditional sequential way of working. The findings show that the suggested relatively unique parallel approach has a positive impact on the expected musculoskeletal risk and does not necessarily negatively affect productivity, in terms of cycle time and time balance between assembly stations. The time to perform the more complex two-parameter optimization in parallel was shorter than the time in the sequential process. The majority of the subjects stated that they preferred the parallel way of working compared to the traditional serial way of working.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2024. Vol. 12, no 12, article id 2871
Keywords [en]
ergonomics, human well-being, system performance, optimization, production development, balancing, productivity
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
User Centred Product Design; VF-KDO
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-24816DOI: 10.3390/pr12122871ISI: 001383897300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85213231112OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-24816DiVA, id: diva2:1924185
Part of project
MOSIM – Modular Simulation of Natural Human Motions, VinnovaSynergy Virtual Ergonomics (SVE), Knowledge FoundationVirtual factories with knowledge-driven optimization (VF-KDO), Knowledge Foundation
Funder
VinnovaKnowledge Foundation
Note

CC BY 4.0

Correspondence: lars.hanson@his.se

This article belongs to the Special Issue Processes in Industry 4.0/5.0: Automation, Robotics and Smart Manufacturing

This work has received support from Eureka Cluster ITEA3/Vinnova in the project MOSIM, and from the Knowledge Foundation within the Synergy Virtual Ergonomics (SVE) project and the Virtual Factories–Knowledge-Driven Optimization (VF-KDO) research profile, and from the participating organizations. This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Available from: 2025-01-03 Created: 2025-01-03 Last updated: 2025-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2185 kB)98 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2185 kBChecksum SHA-512
b94a3ad2888e1cca2b7d7612a5f03a543e18ea50b153994357550fb1e7f2844d2abceac12dc89fc3617377cd86ac32d162dc4fa371f510b0904cdbed9842e51a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hanson, LarsHögberg, Dan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hanson, LarsHögberg, Dan
By organisation
School of Engineering ScienceVirtual Engineering Research Environment
In the same journal
Processes
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 98 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 394 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf