Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is emergency doctors’ tolerance of clinical uncertainty on a novel measure associated with doctor well-being, healthcare resource use and patient outcomes?
Bradford Institute for Health Research, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2905-6011
Bradford Institute for Health Research, UK.
The University of Sheffield School of Health and Related Research, UK.
The University of Sheffield School of Health and Related Research, UK.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Emergency Medicine Journal, ISSN 1472-0205, E-ISSN 1472-0213, Vol. 42, no 1, p. 41-48Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Emergency doctors routinely face uncertainty-they work with limited patient information, under tight time constraints and receive minimal post-discharge feedback. While higher uncertainty tolerance (UT) among staff is linked with reduced resource use and improved well-being in various specialties, its impact in emergency settings is underexplored. We aimed to develop a UT measure and assess associations with doctor-related factors (eg, experience), patient outcomes (eg, reattendance) and resource use (eg, episode costs).

Methods: From May 2021 to February 2022, emergency doctors (specialty trainee 3 and above) from five Yorkshire (UK) departments completed an online questionnaire. This included a novel UT measure-an adapted Physicians' Reaction to Uncertainty scale collaboratively modified within our team according to Hillen et al's (2017) UT model. The questionnaire also included well-being-related measures (eg, Brief Resilience Scale) and assessed factors like doctors' seniority. Patient encounters involving prespecified 'uncertainty-inducing' problems (eg, headache) were analysed. Multilevel regression explored associations between doctor-level factors, resource use and patient outcomes.

Results: 39 doctors were matched with 384 patients. The UT measure demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.92) and higher UT was significantly associated with better psychological well-being including greater resilience (Pearson's r=0.56; 95% CI=0.30 to 0.74) and lower burnout (eg, Cohen's d=-2.98; -4.62 to -1.33; mean UT difference for 'no' vs 'moderate/high' burnout). UT was not significantly associated with resource use (eg, episode costs: beta=-0.07; -0.32 to 0.18) or patient outcomes including 30-day readmission (eg, OR=0.82; 0.28 to 2.35).

Conclusions: We developed a reliable UT measure for emergency medicine. While higher UT was linked to doctor well-being, its impact on resource use and patient outcomes remains unclear. Further measure validation and additional research including intervention trials are necessary to confirm these findings and explore the implications of UT in emergency practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2025. Vol. 42, no 1, p. 41-48
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Research subject
Research on Citizen Centered Health, University of Skövde (Reacch US)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-24782DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213256ISI: 001368387800001PubMedID: 39608855Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85214359703OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-24782DiVA, id: diva2:1921146
Note

CC BY 4.0

Correspondence to Dr Luke Budworth; l.w.budworth@leeds.ac.uk

This report is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Yorkshire and Humber Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) (NIHR200166) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care. ADS is funded by a postdoctoral fellowship from THIS Institute, NIHR (AI_AWARD01864 and COV-LT-0009), UKRI (Horizon Europe Guarantee for DataTools4Heart) and British Heart Foundation Accelerator Award (AA/18/6/24223).

Available from: 2024-12-13 Created: 2024-12-13 Last updated: 2025-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(793 kB)46 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 793 kBChecksum SHA-512
6322333e97308023a5f0c781fe0ce4440c8f00e561ab6bd8b5f6da46822d67ca5320be903b206a61fa48b7a51f0410097840251c24c90d2275e9e1f622145e3f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bank, Sakarias Einar Sefik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Budworth, LukeO'Keeffe, ColinMason, Suzanne MBank, Sakarias Einar Sefik
By organisation
School of Health SciencesDigital Health Research (DHEAR)
In the same journal
Emergency Medicine Journal
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 62 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 123 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf