Is emergency doctors’ tolerance of clinical uncertainty on a novel measure associated with doctor well-being, healthcare resource use and patient outcomes?Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Emergency Medicine Journal, ISSN 1472-0205, E-ISSN 1472-0213, Vol. 42, no 1, p. 41-48Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Introduction: Emergency doctors routinely face uncertainty-they work with limited patient information, under tight time constraints and receive minimal post-discharge feedback. While higher uncertainty tolerance (UT) among staff is linked with reduced resource use and improved well-being in various specialties, its impact in emergency settings is underexplored. We aimed to develop a UT measure and assess associations with doctor-related factors (eg, experience), patient outcomes (eg, reattendance) and resource use (eg, episode costs).
Methods: From May 2021 to February 2022, emergency doctors (specialty trainee 3 and above) from five Yorkshire (UK) departments completed an online questionnaire. This included a novel UT measure-an adapted Physicians' Reaction to Uncertainty scale collaboratively modified within our team according to Hillen et al's (2017) UT model. The questionnaire also included well-being-related measures (eg, Brief Resilience Scale) and assessed factors like doctors' seniority. Patient encounters involving prespecified 'uncertainty-inducing' problems (eg, headache) were analysed. Multilevel regression explored associations between doctor-level factors, resource use and patient outcomes.
Results: 39 doctors were matched with 384 patients. The UT measure demonstrated high reliability (Cronbach's alpha=0.92) and higher UT was significantly associated with better psychological well-being including greater resilience (Pearson's r=0.56; 95% CI=0.30 to 0.74) and lower burnout (eg, Cohen's d=-2.98; -4.62 to -1.33; mean UT difference for 'no' vs 'moderate/high' burnout). UT was not significantly associated with resource use (eg, episode costs: beta=-0.07; -0.32 to 0.18) or patient outcomes including 30-day readmission (eg, OR=0.82; 0.28 to 2.35).
Conclusions: We developed a reliable UT measure for emergency medicine. While higher UT was linked to doctor well-being, its impact on resource use and patient outcomes remains unclear. Further measure validation and additional research including intervention trials are necessary to confirm these findings and explore the implications of UT in emergency practice.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2025. Vol. 42, no 1, p. 41-48
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Research subject
Research on Citizen Centered Health, University of Skövde (Reacch US)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-24782DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2023-213256ISI: 001368387800001PubMedID: 39608855Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85214359703OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-24782DiVA, id: diva2:1921146
Note
CC BY 4.0
Correspondence to Dr Luke Budworth; l.w.budworth@leeds.ac.uk
This report is independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Yorkshire and Humber Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) (NIHR200166) and the National Institute for Health and Care Research Yorkshire and Humber Patient Safety Research Collaboration (PSRC). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care. ADS is funded by a postdoctoral fellowship from THIS Institute, NIHR (AI_AWARD01864 and COV-LT-0009), UKRI (Horizon Europe Guarantee for DataTools4Heart) and British Heart Foundation Accelerator Award (AA/18/6/24223).
2024-12-132024-12-132025-09-29Bibliographically approved