Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Use of the Natural Outdoor Environment in Different Populations in Europe in Relation to Access: Implications for Policy
Centre for Health and Development, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK ; Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4364-9814
Mariana Arcaya’s Research Lab, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA ; Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability, Institute for Environmental Science and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain ; IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain ; Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain ; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.
Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL), ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain ; Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain ; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6257-5091
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, ISSN 1661-7827, E-ISSN 1660-4601, Vol. 19, no 4, article id 2226Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This cross-cultural study explores the relationship of natural outdoor environment (NOE) use with NOE access. Most urban planning recommendations suggest optimal accessibility to be 300 m–500 m straight distance to spaces with vegetation of at least 1 hectare. Exploring this recommendation, we used data (n = 3947) from four European cities collected in the framework of the PHENOTYPE study: Barcelona (Spain), Doetinchem (The Netherlands), Kaunas (Lithuania) and Stoke-on-Trent (United Kingdom) to obtain residential access to NOE (straight or network distances, using 300 m and 150 m buffers, to NOE larger than 1 hectare or 0.5 hectare) and use of NOE (i.e., self-reported time spent in NOE). Poisson regression models were used to examine the associations between residential access and use of NOE. The models with the strongest association with time spent in NOE in the combined sample were for those living within 300 m straight line distance to either 0.5 ha or 1 ha NOE. Noting that the only indicator that was consistent across all individual cities was living with 150 m network buffer of NOE (of at least 1 ha), this warrants further exploration in reducing recommendations of 300 m straight-line distance to 150 m network distance to 1 ha of NOE for a general indicator for cities within Europe.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2022. Vol. 19, no 4, article id 2226
Keywords [en]
natural outdoor environments, green space, access, use, distance, time spent
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-24534DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042226ISI: 000775637200001PubMedID: 35206413Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85124582982OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-24534DiVA, id: diva2:1898803
Funder
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 282996
Note

CC BY 4.0

Submission received: 28 December 2021 / Revised: 26 January 2022 / Accepted: 5 February 2022 / Published: 16 February 2022

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human-Centered Approach in City Regeneration)

Correspondence: daniel.masterson@ju.se

This research received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no: 282996 (ENV.2011.1.2.3-2) (Positive effects of natural environment for human health and well-being), Duration: 1 January 2012–31 December 2015. M.T.-M. was partially funded by a Juan de la Cierva fellowship [FJCI-2017-33842] awarded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. W.L.Z. is supported by a Sara Borrell grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CD17/00195).

Available from: 2024-09-18 Created: 2024-09-18 Last updated: 2025-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(858 kB)140 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 858 kBChecksum SHA-512
8b9280b770e1ff870464d7963f577a4502f69479319671f23f79d648fd9a0955e0b80424f652dc08060130b3073c0d828b8441097e745b45443ea26814cb4c55
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Masterson, Daniel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Masterson, DanielZijlema, WilmaMartinez, DavidGidlow, ChristopherHurst, GemmaGrazuleviciene, ReginaKruize, Hanneke
In the same journal
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Public Health, Global Health and Social MedicineOccupational Health and Environmental Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 140 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 246 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf