Use of the Natural Outdoor Environment in Different Populations in Europe in Relation to Access: Implications for PolicyShow others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, ISSN 1661-7827, E-ISSN 1660-4601, Vol. 19, no 4, article id 2226
Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
This cross-cultural study explores the relationship of natural outdoor environment (NOE) use with NOE access. Most urban planning recommendations suggest optimal accessibility to be 300 m–500 m straight distance to spaces with vegetation of at least 1 hectare. Exploring this recommendation, we used data (n = 3947) from four European cities collected in the framework of the PHENOTYPE study: Barcelona (Spain), Doetinchem (The Netherlands), Kaunas (Lithuania) and Stoke-on-Trent (United Kingdom) to obtain residential access to NOE (straight or network distances, using 300 m and 150 m buffers, to NOE larger than 1 hectare or 0.5 hectare) and use of NOE (i.e., self-reported time spent in NOE). Poisson regression models were used to examine the associations between residential access and use of NOE. The models with the strongest association with time spent in NOE in the combined sample were for those living within 300 m straight line distance to either 0.5 ha or 1 ha NOE. Noting that the only indicator that was consistent across all individual cities was living with 150 m network buffer of NOE (of at least 1 ha), this warrants further exploration in reducing recommendations of 300 m straight-line distance to 150 m network distance to 1 ha of NOE for a general indicator for cities within Europe.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2022. Vol. 19, no 4, article id 2226
Keywords [en]
natural outdoor environments, green space, access, use, distance, time spent
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-24534DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042226ISI: 000775637200001PubMedID: 35206413Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85124582982OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-24534DiVA, id: diva2:1898803
Funder
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 282996
Note
CC BY 4.0
Submission received: 28 December 2021 / Revised: 26 January 2022 / Accepted: 5 February 2022 / Published: 16 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human-Centered Approach in City Regeneration)
Correspondence: daniel.masterson@ju.se
This research received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no: 282996 (ENV.2011.1.2.3-2) (Positive effects of natural environment for human health and well-being), Duration: 1 January 2012–31 December 2015. M.T.-M. was partially funded by a Juan de la Cierva fellowship [FJCI-2017-33842] awarded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. W.L.Z. is supported by a Sara Borrell grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CD17/00195).
2024-09-182024-09-182025-09-29Bibliographically approved