Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development of the Preferred Components for Co-Design in Research Guideline and Checklist: Protocol for a Scoping Review and a Modified Delphi Process
KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada ; Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada ; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, ON, Canada ; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0595-8395
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, ON, Canada ; Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2146-0001
KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID iD: 0009-0000-0977-7711
KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada ; Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7860-9463
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: JMIR Research Protocols, E-ISSN 1929-0748, Vol. 12, article id e50463Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: There is increasing evidence that co-design can lead to more engaging, acceptable, relevant, feasible, and even effective interventions. However, no guidance is provided on the specific designs and associated methods or methodologies involved in the process. We propose the development of the Preferred Components for Co-design in Research (PRECISE) guideline to enhance the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting co-design studies used to develop complex health interventions.

Objective: The aim is to develop the first iteration of the PRECISE guideline. The purpose of the PRECISE guideline is to improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reporting on studies that use co-design to develop complex health interventions.

Methods: The aim will be achieved by addressing the following objectives: to review and synthesize the literature on the models, theories, and frameworks used in the co-design of complex health interventions to identify their common elements (components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes); and by using the results of the scoping review, prioritize the co-design components, values or principles, associated methods and methodologies, and outcomes to be included in the PRECISE guideline.

Results: The project has been funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Conclusions: The collective results of this project will lead to a ready-to-implement PRECISE guideline that outlines a minimum set of items to include when reporting the co-design of complex health interventions. The PRECISE guideline will improve the consistency, transparency, and quality of reports of studies. Additionally, it will include guidance on how to enact or enable the values or principles of co-design for meaningful and collaborative solutions (interventions). PRECISE might also be used by peer reviewers and editors to improve the review of manuscripts involving co-design. Ultimately, the PRECISE guideline will facilitate more efficient use of new results about complex health intervention development and bring better returns on research investments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
JMIR Publications, 2023. Vol. 12, article id e50463
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-24523DOI: 10.2196/50463ISI: 001104086300001PubMedID: 37902812Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85177483492OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-24523DiVA, id: diva2:1898092
Note

CC BY 4.0

Corresponding Author: Sarah EP Munce, PhD, KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network

SS is partly funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, the NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Genomics and Enabling Data, the NIHR Warwick Evidence Synthesis Group, and the NIHR Health Determinants Research Collaboration Coventry. ACT holds the Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Synthesis. CSG holds the Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Digital Health Innovation. KK holds the Dr Mathias Research Chair in Patient & Family Centered Care, supported by the Trillium Health Partners Foundation.

Available from: 2024-09-16 Created: 2024-09-16 Last updated: 2025-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(180 kB)80 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 180 kBChecksum SHA-512
bcdf7d9bbc2c3c994aa8fb7b302a714e1ef19fa18da1e2a059a85a1a1dc925779a4d25eab37db13e0c045e32ebc6f59404eba5bcbf9a9c09cee8151c79e2e2e6
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Masterson, Daniel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Munce, Sarah E. P.Steele Gray, CarolynPomeroy, Beverley ClaireBayley, MarkKokorelias, Kristina MarieLuong, DorothyBiddiss, ElaineCave, TrishBragge, PeterChew-Graham, Carolyn A.Colquhoun, HeatherDadich, AnnDainty, Katie N.Elliott, MarkFeng, PatrickGoldhar, JodemeHamilton, Clayon B.Harvey, GillianKastner, MonikaKothari, AnitaLangley, JoeJeffs, LianneMasterson, DanielNelson, Michelle L. A.Perrier, LaureRiley, JohnSellen, KateSeto, EmilySimpson, RobertStaniszewska, SophieSrinivasan, VasanthiStraus, Sharon E.Tricco, Andrea C.Kuluski, Kerry
In the same journal
JMIR Research Protocols
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 87 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 186 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf