Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The complexity of leadership in coproduction practices: a guiding framework based on a systematic literature review
The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Sweden.
Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, UK.
The Jönköping Academy for Improvement of Health and Welfare, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4364-9814
2024 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 24, no 1, article id 219Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: As coproduction in public services increases, understanding the role of leadership in this context is essential to the tasks of establishing relational partnerships and addressing power differentials among groups. The aims of this review are to explore models of coproduction leadership and the processes involved in leading coproduction as well as, based on that exploration, to develop a guiding framework for coproduction practices.

Methods: A systematic review that synthesizes the evidence reported by 73 papers related to coproduction of health and welfare.

Results: Despite the fact that models of coleadership and collective leadership exhibit a better fit with the relational character of coproduction, the majority of the articles included in this review employed a leader-centric underlying theory. The practice of coproduction leadership is a complex activity pertaining to interactions among people, encompassing nine essential practices: initiating, power-sharing, training, supporting, establishing trust, communicating, networking, orchestration, and implementation.

Conclusions: This paper proposes a novel framework for coproduction leadership practices based on a systematic review of the literature and a set of reflective questions. This framework aims to help coproduction leaders and participants understand the complexity, diversity, and flexibility of coproduction leadership and to challenge and enhance their capacity to collaborate effectively.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024. Vol. 24, no 1, article id 219
Keywords [en]
Management, Leadership, Coproduction, Health and welfare
National Category
Business Administration Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-24521DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10549-4ISI: 001163766500001PubMedID: 38368329Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85185404972OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-24521DiVA, id: diva2:1897829
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2018-01431
Note

CC BY 4.0

Correspondence: Sofa Kjellström, sofia.kjellstrom@ju.se

Correction in: BMC Health Services Research, Volume 24, March 2024, Article number: 335. doi:10.1186/s12913-024-10811-9

Open access funding provided by Jönköping University. The study of Samskapa, a coproduction research programme, received funding from Forte, the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, under grant agreement no. 2018–01431.

Available from: 2024-09-16 Created: 2024-09-16 Last updated: 2025-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1209 kB)80 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1209 kBChecksum SHA-512
1325254192c4e1adab1829dc426a06a2b2ee045e2ab2088989ca5f47f867808dfc5086e737a26728bdb31a18e17e10dc37b4e57ee68052243598f2db444e7e63
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusCorrection: The complexity of leadership in coproduction practices: a guiding framework based on a systematic literature review

Authority records

Masterson, Daniel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Masterson, Daniel
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Business AdministrationHealth Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 80 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 126 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf