Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Process Stability Strategies in Milling of Thin-walled Inconel 718
University West, Trollhättan, Sweden.
University West, Trollhättan, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9331-7354
University West, Trollhättan, Sweden ; Volvo Aero Corporation, Trollhättan, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0976-9820
University West, Trollhättan, Sweden ; Volvo Aero Corporation, Trollhättan, Sweden ; Production Technology Center, Innovatum AB, Trollhättan, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1408-2249
2012 (English)In: The 4th Manufacturing engineering society international conference (MESIC 2011): 21–23 September 2011, Cadiz, Spain / [ed] Mariano Marcos; Jorge Salguero, American Institute of Physics (AIP), 2012, p. 465-472Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Trends in Aerospace development have led to thin-walled, reduced-weight engine designs. The demands in manufacturing have forced production speeds and material removal rates (MRR) to increase. As component wall thickness gets thinner, the consequence oftentimes is an increase in chatter vibrations. This paper suggests that a correctly chosen tool-to-workpiece offset geometry may lead to a robust and chatter free process. The results show the differences in force response for three geometries while varying the height overhang of the workpiece. This is part of a concerted effort to develop a robust methodology for the prediction of chatter vibrations during milling operations of thin-walled Aerospace components. This paper gives guidelines on how to accomplish robust machining practices. It also answers the following questions: How critical is the choice of offset between tool and workpiece during milling setup? And what effects do the entry and exit of cut have on system vibrations?

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Institute of Physics (AIP), 2012. p. 465-472
Series
AIP Conference Proceedings, ISSN 0094-243X, E-ISSN 1551-7616 ; 1431/1
Keywords [en]
Thin-wall, Inconel 718, chatter, machining vibrations
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-22379DOI: 10.1063/1.4707597ISI: 000307644700054Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84863327648ISBN: 978-0-7354-1017-6 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-22379DiVA, id: diva2:1748920
Conference
The 4th Manufacturing engineering society international conference (MESIC 2011), 21–23 September 2011, Cadiz, Spain
Available from: 2012-05-31 Created: 2023-04-04 Last updated: 2025-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusProceedings

Authority records

Wanner, BertilEynian, MahdiBeno, TomasPejryd, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wanner, BertilEynian, MahdiBeno, TomasPejryd, Lars
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and ErgonomicsManufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 143 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf