New evidence and challenges in ERP and MEG correlates of consciousness in vision: A systematized review
2026 (English)In: NeuroImage, ISSN 1053-8119, E-ISSN 1095-9572, Vol. 327, article id 121762Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
The past twenty years of research have revealed two event-related potential (ERP) components to be the most reliably occurring neural correlates of consciousness (NCC) in vision: an early visual awareness negativity (VAN) in the N2 and late positivity (LP) in the P3 time window. Three previous extensive reviews concluded that VAN is a proper visual NCC, which is solely modulated by awareness. During the last five years since the latest review was published, a large body of new evidence has emerged about the ERP correlates of visual consciousness. In this systematized review we update the results of the previous reviews by analyzing new studies published since 2020 (N = 53) and discussing their findings. The new evidence is consistent with the earlier reviews: VAN is still found to be the most reliable and robust ERP NCC in vision, whereas LP reflects also many other processes, not consciousness as such. However, several aspects of VAN, for example, its relationship to attention and simultaneous physiological factors, require further investigation.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2026. Vol. 327, article id 121762
Keywords [en]
Awareness, Conscious perception, Consciousness, EEG, ERP, Late positivity, Neural correlates of consciousness, Perceptual awareness negativity, Theories of consciousness, Visual awareness negativity, Visual consciousness, adult, article, complication, diagnosis, electroencephalogram, electroencephalography, event related potential, evoked response, human, human experiment, perception, vision
National Category
Neurosciences Psychology (Excluding Applied Psychology) Neurology
Research subject
Consciousness and Cognitive Neuroscience
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-26157DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2026.121762ISI: 001683118300001PubMedID: 41616989Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105029053692OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-26157DiVA, id: diva2:2037855
Note
CC BY 4.0
Copyright © 2026. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Correspondence Address: D. Filimonov; Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, 20014, Finland; email: dmitri.d.filimonov@utu.fi; CODEN: NEIME
Dmitri Filimonov reports financial support was provided by Signe and Ane Gyllenberg Foundation.
2026-02-122026-02-122026-02-24Bibliographically approved