Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
1819202122232421 of 36
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sterile water injections for managing abdominal labour contraction pain: A randomised double blind placebo-controlled trial
School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
University of Skövde, School of Health Sciences. University of Skövde, Digital Health Research (DHEAR). (Family-Centred Health (FamCeH))ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0079-3966
Molly Wardaguga Research Institute, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Women's and Newborn Services, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: International Journal of Nursing Studies, ISSN 0020-7489, E-ISSN 1873-491X, Vol. 173, no January 2026, article id 105244Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Sterile water injections have been demonstrated to effectively manage back pain experienced during labour with no side effects other than the administration pain. Abdominal labour pain differs to back pain in location and likely physiological derivation. It is not known if sterile water injections would be efficacious in the relief of abdominal labour contraction pain.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of sterile water injections to reduce abdominal labour contraction pain. Design: A two-arm superiority randomised placebo-controlled trial. Setting: A referral maternity hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Participants: Women in spontaneous or induced labour at term requesting analgesia.

Methods: Between April 2022 and November 2023 consenting participants were assigned (1:1) by an independently generated randomisation schedule to injections of either sterile water or saline placebo. The primary outcome was the difference between groups in self-reported visual analogue pain score at 30 min following allocated treatment. Secondary outcomes included use of pharmacologic analgesia following allocation. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Results: 160 women were randomised to sterile water injections (n = 81) or injections of saline placebo (n = 79). Seven participants withdrew prior to treatment. Primary outcome data was provided by 68 women (intervention) and 64 (placebo). The mean visual analogue scores at 30 min were: intervention: 52.13 mm (with 100 mm indicating worst conceivable pain) and placebo: 71.14 mm; mean difference: − 19.00 mm (95 % Confidence interval (CI) − 26.10 to − 11.91). Pain scores in the secondary repeated measures model at 60 min post treatment were (61.28 mm vs.76.15 mm) − 14.84 (95 % CI − 22.23 to − 7.46). There was no difference in pain scores at 90 min, use of other pharmacological analgesia, or maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion: Sterile water injections provided a statistically significant reduction in pain when compared to a placebo for up to 60 min following treatment. However, the use of other pharmacological analgesia such as epidural did not differ between groups.

Trial registration: The trial is registered at the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Trial ID: ACTRN12621001036808). Registration date 5/08/2021. First recruitment 29th April 2022.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2026. Vol. 173, no January 2026, article id 105244
Keywords [en]
labour pain, non-pharmacological analgesia, randomised controlled trial, Sterile water injections
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Research subject
Family-Centred Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-25950DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105244PubMedID: 41101012Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105018611054OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-25950DiVA, id: diva2:2008926
Note

CC BY 4.0

© 2025

Correspondence Address: N. Lee; School of Nursing Midwifery and Social Work, Level 3 Chamberlain Building, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4072, Australia; email: nigel.lee@uq.edu.au; CODEN: IJNUA

The trial was funded by the Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Australian Federal Government (2006488). Dr Nigel Lee is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Emerging Leadership Fellowship (EL1) (2016432). The funders had no role in the design of the study, the data collection, the data analysis, interpretation of data, or writing of the manuscript.

Available from: 2025-10-24 Created: 2025-10-24 Last updated: 2025-10-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(771 kB)14 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 771 kBChecksum SHA-512
66d758ca29ced5215ad9269afdc0a260a78d453ce7386ef4e399372b3c4e29ae5ff509387e33e016c5b91a104b75cb71a185afeb41490abed27c4d73ad595bdc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mårtensson, Lena B.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mårtensson, Lena B.
By organisation
School of Health SciencesDigital Health Research (DHEAR)
In the same journal
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive MedicineAnesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 65 hits
1819202122232421 of 36
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf