Open this publication in new window or tab >> Show others...
2023 (English) In: Brain and Cognition, ISSN 0278-2626, E-ISSN 1090-2147, Vol. 170, article id 106060Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en] Purpose: To evaluate the neurophenomenology of automatic writing (AW) in a spontaneous automatic writer (NN) and four high hypnotizables (HH). Methods: During fMRI, NN and the HH were cued to perform spontaneous (NN) or induced (HH) AW, and a comparison task of copying complex symbols, and to rate their experience of control and agency. Results: Compared to copying, for all participants AW was associated with less sense of control and agency and decreased BOLD signal responses in brain regions implicated in the sense of agency (left premotor cortex and insula, right premotor cortex, and supplemental motor area), and increased BOLD signal responses in the left and right temporoparietal junctions and the occipital lobes. During AW, the HH differed from NN in widespread BOLD decreases across the brain and increases in frontal and parietal regions. Conclusions: Spontaneous and induced AW had similar effects on agency, but only partly overlapping effects on cortical activity.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2023
Keywords Automatic writing, fMRI, Hypnosis, Anomalous experience, Agency
National Category
Neurosciences Psychology (Excluding Applied Psychology)
Identifiers urn:nbn:se:his:diva-26274 (URN) 10.1016/j.bandc.2023.106060 (DOI) 001039168600001 () 37421816 (PubMedID) 2-s2.0-85164214125 (Scopus ID)
Funder The Crafoord Foundation, 20200796
Note CC BY 4.0
Corresponding author at: Department of Psychology, Center for Research on Consciousness and Anomalous Psychology (CERCAP), Lund University, Allhelgona kyrkogata 16a, Lund 22100, Sweden. E-mail address: Etzel.Cardena@psy.lu.se (E. Cardeña).
Volume 170, August 2023
This work was supported by Crafoord Grant 20,200,796 to EC.
2026-04-162026-04-162026-04-20 Bibliographically approved