his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cognitive Aspects Affecting Human Performance in Manual Assembly
University of Skövde, School of Engineering Science. University of Skövde, The Virtual Systems Research Centre. Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, UK. (User Centred Product Design)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2915-8923
Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, UK. (User Centred Product Design)
University of Skövde, School of Engineering Science. University of Skövde, The Virtual Systems Research Centre. (User Centred Product Design)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8369-5471
2016 (English)In: Advances in Manufacturing Technology XXX / [ed] Yee Mey Goh, Keith Case, IOS Press, 2016, 231-236 p.Conference paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper concerns the handling of information in assembly work environments. Several studies involving both literature reviews, case studies andobservations were conducted to find factors that affect human performance in manual assembly. The main experiment with 36 subjects used a mixed method design with a quantitative study, including time and errors as dependant measures,a qualitative study, including workload ratings, and a questionnaire. The experiment involved the assembly of a pedal car and the components werepresented using structured kits, unstructured kits and material racks. Assembly information was presented as text & component numbers or photographs, and situations with and without component variation were considered. Among theresults it was found that assembly times and workload ratings were lower when using a kit, whereas using a material rack resulted in perceived decreased workflow and increased stress and frustration. Assembly times and workload ratings were lower when using photographs, whereas using text and numbers increased mental workload.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOS Press, 2016. 231-236 p.
Series
Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, ISSN 2352-751X, E-ISSN 2352-7528 ; 3
Keyword [en]
Cognitive ergonomics, manual assembly, human factors, manufacturing, information design, material presentation, kitting
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-12945DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-668-2-231ISI: 000383745300038ISBN: 978-1-61499-667-5 (print)ISBN: 978-1-61499-668-2 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-12945DiVA: diva2:972794
Conference
14th International Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR), Loughborough, United Kingdom, September 6–8, 2016
Available from: 2016-09-22 Created: 2016-09-22 Last updated: 2017-02-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Brolin, AnnaCase, KeithThorvald, Peter
By organisation
School of Engineering ScienceThe Virtual Systems Research Centre
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 181 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf