Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Managing healthcare information: analyzing trust
University of Skövde, School of Informatics. University of Skövde, The Informatics Research Centre. (Information Systems)
University of Skövde, School of Business. University of Skövde, Enterprises for the Future. (Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens, Followership and Organizational Resilience (FORE))ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5718-0100
University of Skövde, School of Informatics. University of Skövde, The Informatics Research Centre. (Information Systems)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8607-948X
2016 (English)In: International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, ISSN 0952-6862, E-ISSN 1758-6542, Vol. 29, no 7, p. 786-800Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to analyze two case studies with a trust matrix tool, to identify trust issues related to electronic health records. Design/methodology/approach– A qualitative research approach is applied using two case studies. The data analysis of these studies generated a problem list, which was mapped to a trust matrix. Findings– Results demonstrate flaws in current practices and point to achieving balance between organizational, person and technology trust perspectives. The analysis revealed three challenge areas, to: achieve higher trust in patient-focussed healthcare; improve communication between patients and healthcare professionals; and establish clear terminology. By taking trust into account, a more holistic perspective on healthcare can be achieved, where trust can be obtained and optimized. Research limitations/implications– A trust matrix is tested and shown to identify trust problems on different levels and relating to trusting beliefs. Future research should elaborate and more fully address issues within three identified challenge areas. Practical implications– The trust matrix’s usefulness as a tool for organizations to analyze trust problems and issues is demonstrated. Originality/value– Healthcare trust issues are captured to a greater extent and from previously unchartered perspectives.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2016. Vol. 29, no 7, p. 786-800
Keywords [en]
Medical records, Trust, Health and safety, Public health service, Patient safety, Electronic healthcare records, Trust matrix
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects
Research subject
Technology; Information Systems; Followership and Organizational Resilience
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-12859DOI: 10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2015-0136ISI: 000382484800007PubMedID: 27477934Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84980322429OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-12859DiVA, id: diva2:957181
Available from: 2016-09-01 Created: 2016-09-01 Last updated: 2019-01-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Söderström, EvaEriksson, NomieÅhlfeldt, Rose-Mharie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Söderström, EvaEriksson, NomieÅhlfeldt, Rose-Mharie
By organisation
School of InformaticsThe Informatics Research CentreSchool of BusinessEnterprises for the Future
In the same journal
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
Information Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 837 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf