his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Building a new production line: Problems, pitfalls and how to gain social sustainability
University of Skövde, School of Engineering Science.
University of Skövde, School of Engineering Science.
2015 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (university diploma), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This thesis has been performed in collaboration with Volvo Cars Engine in Skövde, Sweden and Zhangjia-kou, China in order to receive a bachelor degree in automation engineering from the University of Skövde.

The project focuses on analyzing the capacity of a future production line by using discrete event simulation. The production line is built in two different discrete event simulation software, FACTS analyzer and Plant Simulation. The focus of the study will be to compare the output results from the two software in order to give recommendations for which software to use in similar cases. This is done in order for Volvo Cars Corporation to have as a basis for further work in similar cases. The aim of the work is to verify the planned capacity of the new production line and to perform a leadership study with Chinese engineers in order to find out how they view the Swedish leadership and how this can be adapted to China and the Chinese culture and give recommendations for future work.

The results of the capacity analysis show that the goals of parts produced can be reached for both planned capacities but also that there are potential constraints that have been identified in the system. The results of the leadership study also show that the overall approach should be slightly adapted to be better suited for the Chinese culture. The comparison of the two simulation software suggests that FACTS Analyzer is suit-able to use when less complex logic or systems are represented, however when building more complex models consisting of more complex logic Plant Simulation is more suitable.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 70 p.
Keyword [en]
Discrete Event Simulation, Capacity Studies, Leadership, Cultural differences, Production systems, Plant Simulation and FACTS analyzer
National Category
Robotics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-11370OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-11370DiVA: diva2:846778
Subject / course
Automation Engineering
Educational program
Industrial Automation Engineer
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-08-19 Created: 2015-08-18 Last updated: 2015-08-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4201 kB)193 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4201 kBChecksum SHA-512
9e7f8f209c273cdc074344adfb25f4f02b843e7f194f92de4ebf2446ea59574db28b8c07bcd9c558eb5b0654454cb138dda2e969824bd799b8e05f8946b48182
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Engineering Science
Robotics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 193 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 2411 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf