Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Perceived risks and benefits of cigarette smoking among Nepalese adolescents: a population-based cross-sectional study
Kathmandu Medical College, Nepal ; Nordic School of Public Health NHV, Gothenburg.
Nordic School of Public Health NHV, Gothenburg, Sweden ; Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg.
Nordic School of Public Health NHV, Gothenburg ; Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4583-9315
2013 (English)In: BMC Public Health, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 13, article id 187Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The perceived risks and benefits of smoking may play an important role in determining adolescents' susceptibility to initiating smoking. Our study examined the perceived risks and benefits of smoking among adolescents who demonstrated susceptibility or non susceptibility to smoking initiation.

METHODS: In October-November 2011, we conducted a population-based cross-sectional study in Jhaukhel and Duwakot Villages in Nepal. Located in the mid-hills of Bhaktapur District, 13 kilometers east of Kathmandu, Jhaukhel and Duwakot represent the prototypical urbanizing villages that surround Nepal's major urban centers, where young people have easy access to tobacco products and are influenced by advertising. Jhaukhel and Duwakot had a total population of 13,669, of which 15% were smokers. Trained enumerators used a semi-structured questionnaire to interview 352 randomly selected 14- to 16-year-old adolescents. The enumerators asked the adolescents to estimate their likelihood (0%-100%) of experiencing various smoking-related risks and benefits in a hypothetical scenario.

RESULTS: Principal component analysis extracted four perceived risk and benefit components, excluding addiction risk: (i) physical risk I (lung cancer, heart disease, wrinkles, bad colds); (ii) physical risk II (bad cough, bad breath, trouble breathing); (iii) social risk (getting into trouble, smelling like an ashtray); and (iv) social benefit (looking cool, feeling relaxed, becoming popular, and feeling grown-up). The adjusted odds ratio of susceptibility increased 1.20-fold with each increased quartile in perception of physical Risk I. Susceptibility to smoking was 0.27- and 0.90-fold less among adolescents who provided the highest estimates of physical Risk II and social risk, respectively. Similarly, susceptibility was 2.16-fold greater among adolescents who provided the highest estimates of addiction risk. Physical risk I, addiction risk, and social benefits of cigarette smoking related positively, and physical risk II and social risk related negatively, with susceptibility to smoking.

CONCLUSION: To discourage or prevent adolescents from initiating smoking, future intervention programs should focus on communicating not only the health risks but also the social and addiction risks as well as counteract the social benefits of smoking.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2013. Vol. 13, article id 187
Keywords [en]
Susceptibility to smoking, Physical risks, Social risks, Addiction risk, Social benefits
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-11354DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-187ISI: 000317121900002PubMedID: 23452549Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84874398758OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-11354DiVA, id: diva2:846453
Funder
Wilhelm och Martina Lundgrens VetenskapsfondUniversity of Gothenburg
Note

CC BY 2.0

We are grateful to the study participants and their parents. In addition, we acknowledge all enumerators and field supervisors: Rachana Shrestha, Vishal Bhandari, Chandra Shova Khaitu, and Shova Poudel. We thank Dilip Kumar Iswar for administrative support, Professor Mark Myers, Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, USA, for valuable input on the tools, and Arjun Subedi for translating the questionnaire into Nepalese. We offer special thanks to Prof. Dr. Muni Raj Chhetri for his invaluable contribution to field activities and rapport building in the community, and to Prof. Goran Bondjers, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. This study was funded by the Wilhelm & Martina Lundgren’s Foundation and a “Global University” grant from the University of Gothenburg, Sweden. The authors thank scientific editor Karen Williams (Kwills Editing Services, Weymouth, MA, USA) for providing professional English-language editing of this article.

Available from: 2015-08-17 Created: 2015-08-17 Last updated: 2025-04-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(188 kB)1367 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 188 kBChecksum SHA-512
62a243271ffe0edc5ebf011798c818de5362ffb30a21ecc358a210be3f75d1dc63e96aff59976823e57eb228a478f934da0dafdb382716f04ab1789203bf0b1b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Krettek, Alexandra

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Krettek, Alexandra
In the same journal
BMC Public Health
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1367 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1206 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf