his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bohm's approach and individuality
University of Skövde, School of Bioscience. University of Skövde, The Systems Biology Research Centre. University of Helsinki. (Cognitive neuroscience and philosophy)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7838-8293
University of London.
University of Helsinki.
2015 (English)In: Individuals Across the Sciences / [ed] Guay, A. and Pradeu, T., Oxford University Press, 2015, 226-249 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

 Ladyman and Ross (LR) argue that quantum objects are not individuals

(or are at most weakly discernible individuals) and use this idea

to ground their metaphysical view, ontic structural realism, according

to which relational structures are primary to things. LR acknowledge

that there is a version of quantum theory, namely the Bohm theory

(BT), according to which particles do have denite trajectories at all

times. However, LR interpret the research by Brown et al.  as implying

that "raw stuff" or haecceities  are needed for the individuality of

particles of BT, and LR dismiss this as idle metaphysics. In this paper

we note that Brown et al.'s research does not imply that haecceities

are needed. Thus BT remains as a genuine option for those who seek

to understand quantum particles as individuals. However, we go on to

discuss some problems with BT which led Bohm and Hiley to modify it.

This modified version underlines that, due to features such as context-dependence

and non-locality, Bohmian particles have a very limited

autonomy in situations where quantum effects are non-negligible. So

while BT restores the possibility of quantum individuals, it also underlines

the primacy of the whole over the autonomy of the parts. The

later sections of the paper also examine the Bohm theory in the general

mathematical context of symplectic geometry. This provides yet

another way of understanding the subtle, holistic and dynamic nature

of Bohmian individuals. We finally briefly consider Bohm's other main 

line of research, the "implicate order", which is in some ways similar to

LR's structural realism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2015. 226-249 p.
National Category
Philosophy
Research subject
Humanities and Social sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-10770DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199382514.003.0013ISBN: 978-0-19-938251-4 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-10770DiVA: diva2:797487
Available from: 2015-03-24 Created: 2015-03-24 Last updated: 2017-08-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(309 kB)319 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 309 kBChecksum SHA-512
76eb105adf037fe05c2bbb5dda816944ec001e0254359f2404d7a2b515a606496e3849d2d38af1f2669445c6607bdeb9beff550fcded0c3c7d40f48744fceb8e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pylkkänen, Paavo
By organisation
School of BioscienceThe Systems Biology Research Centre
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 319 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 549 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf