his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Intellectual capital dimensions: state of the art in 2014
Production Engineering Department, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
University of Skövde, School of Business. University of Skövde, Enterprises for the Future. (Knowledge and Innovation Management (KIM))ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8469-2427
Production Engineering Department, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Engineering & Knowledge Management Department, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
2015 (English)In: Journal of Intellectual Capital, ISSN 1469-1930, E-ISSN 1758-7468, Vol. 16, no 1, 58-100 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to review extant literature to identify models intended to measure/classify intellectual capital (IC) to establish the current body of knowledge that has been built since the review by Marr et al. (2004).

Design/methodology/approach – The study consists of a systematic review of peer-reviewed articles on IC classification. The review was conducted for the period 2004-2014 in order to reach the aim. To ensure that all major models are included, important works developed prior to 2004 were captured as well.

Findings – The review resulted in 83 additional models indicating continued research activities with regard to the topic. These models were merged with prior IC models and mapped on a timeline. The timeline clarifies that 2008, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 represent the years of greatest research activity (outcomes). Additionally, the analysis of the list of IC frameworks resulted in the development of an IC Meta model. It synthesizes research activities in the field and highlights the main IC dimensions and sub-dimensions.

Research limitations/implications – This study may not have enabled a complete coverage of all existing peer-reviewed articles in the field of IC classification. Yet, it seems reasonable to assume that the review process covered a large proportion of studies available.

Originality/value – By aggregating and consolidating the IC frameworks covered, the study does not only provide an IC Meta model, but also promising directions for future research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2015. Vol. 16, no 1, 58-100 p.
Keyword [en]
Intellectual capital, IC, IC frameworks, IC models, Intellectual capital dimensions, Systematic literature review
National Category
Social Sciences Business Administration
Research subject
Humanities and Social sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-10521DOI: 10.1108/JIC-02-2014-0021ISI: 000355691200003ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84921834720OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-10521DiVA: diva2:779070
Available from: 2015-01-12 Created: 2015-01-12 Last updated: 2016-06-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Durst, Susanne
By organisation
School of BusinessEnterprises for the Future
In the same journal
Journal of Intellectual Capital
Social SciencesBusiness Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 1138 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf