his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Weak vs. Strong Quantum Cognition
University of Skövde, School of Bioscience. University of Skövde, The Systems Biology Research Centre. University of Helsinki, Finland. (Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy)
2015 (English)In: Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (IV): Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Neurodynamics - 2013 / [ed] Hans Liljenström, Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2015, 411-418 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In recent decades some cognitive scientists have adopted a program of quantum cognition. For example, Pothos and Busemeyer (PB) argue that there are empirical results concerning human decision-making and judgment that can be elegantly accounted for by quantum probability (QP) theory, while classical (Bayesian) probability theory fails. They suggest that the reason why QP works better is because some cognitive phenomena are analogous to quantum phenomena. This naturally gives rise to a further question about why they are analogous. Is this a pure coincidence, or is there a deeper reason? For example, could the neural processes underlying cognition involve subtle quantum effects, thus explaining why cognition obeys QP? PB are agnostic about this controversial issue, and thus their kind of program could be labeled as “weak quantum cognition” (analogously to the program of weak artificial intelligence as characterized by Searle). However, there is a long tradition of speculating about the role of subtle quantum effects in the neural correlates of cognition, constituting a program of “strong quantum cognition” (SQC) or “quantum cognitive neuroscience”. This paper considers the prospects of SQC, by briefly reviewing and commenting on some of the key proposals. In particular, Bohm and Hiley’s active information program will be discussed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2015. 411-418 p.
Series
Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics, ISSN 2213-3569 ; IV
Keyword [en]
Quantum cognition, Quantum probability, Analogy, Active 20 information, Implicate order, Mental causation, Representational content, 21 David Bohm, Basil Hiley
National Category
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion
Research subject
Humanities and Social sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-10487DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9548-7_58ISI: 000380362800058ISBN: 978-94-017-9547-0 ISBN: 978-94-017-9548-7 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-10487DiVA: diva2:774950
Available from: 2014-12-30 Created: 2014-12-30 Last updated: 2016-08-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pylkkänen, Paavo
By organisation
School of BioscienceThe Systems Biology Research Centre
Philosophy, Ethics and Religion

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 753 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf