his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Transparency of Automated Combat Classification
University of Skövde, School of Informatics. University of Skövde, The Informatics Research Centre. (Skövde Artificial Intelligence Lab (SAIL))
Saab Aeronautics, Sweden.
University of Skövde, School of Informatics. University of Skövde, The Informatics Research Centre. (Skövde Artificial Intelligence Lab (SAIL))ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8884-2154
University of Skövde, School of Informatics. University of Skövde, The Informatics Research Centre. (Skövde Artificial Intelligence Lab (SAIL))ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2900-9335
2014 (English)In: Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics: 11th International Conference, EPCE 2014, Held as Part of HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27, 2014. Proceedings / [ed] Don Harris, Springer, 2014, 22-33 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

We present an empirical study where the effects of three levels of system transparency of an automated target classification aid on fighter pilots’ performance and initial trust in the system were evaluated. The levels of transparency consisted of (1) only presenting text–based information regarding the specific object (without any automated support), (2) accompanying the text-based information with an automatically generated object class suggestion and (3) adding the incorporated sensor values with associated (uncertain) historic values in graphical form. The results show that the pilots needed more time to make a classification decision when being provided with display condition 2 and 3 than display condition 1. However, the number of correct classifications and the operators’ trust ratings were the highest when using display condition 3. No difference in the pilots’ decision confidence was found, yet slightly higher workload was reported when using display condition 3. The questionnaire results report on the pilots’ general opinion that an automatic classification aid would help them make better and more confident decisions faster, having trained with the system for a longer period.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2014. 22-33 p.
Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ISSN 0302-9743 ; 8532
Keyword [en]
Classification support, automation transparency, uncertainty visualization, fighter pilots
National Category
Computer Science
Research subject
Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-10163DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07515-0_3ISI: 000342845800003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84903643576ISBN: 978-3-319-07514-3 ISBN: 978-3-319-07515-0 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-10163DiVA: diva2:760454
Conference
11th International Conference on Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics, EPCE 2014, Held as Part of 16th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 22 June 2014 through 27 June 2014
Funder
Vinnova
Available from: 2014-11-04 Created: 2014-11-04 Last updated: 2015-01-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Helldin, ToveOhlander, UlrikaFalkman, GöranRiveiro, Maria
By organisation
School of InformaticsThe Informatics Research Centre
Computer Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 814 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf