his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Acupuncture with manual and electrical stimulation for labour pain: a longitudinal randomised controlled trial
Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Division of Reproductive Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden / School of Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Division of Reproductive Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden / Centre for Clinical Research Dalarna, Falun, Sweden.
Department of Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Division of Reproductive Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, ISSN 1472-6882, Vol. 14, 187Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Acupuncture is commonly used to reduce pain during labour despite contradictory results. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of acupuncture with manual stimulation and acupuncture with combined manual and electrical stimulation (electro-acupuncture) compared with standard care in reducing labour pain. Our hypothesis was that both acupuncture stimulation techniques were more effective than standard care, and that electro-acupuncture was most effective.

Methods: A longitudinal randomised controlled trial. The recruitment of participants took place at the admission to the labour ward between November 2008 and October 2011 at two Swedish hospitals . 303 nulliparous women with normal pregnancies were randomised to: 40 minutes of manual acupuncture (MA), electro-acupuncture (EA), or standard care without acupuncture (SC). Primary outcome: labour pain, assessed by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes: relaxation, use of obstetric pain relief during labour and post-partum assessments of labour pain. The sample size calculation was based on the primary outcome and a difference of 15 mm on VAS was regarded as clinically relevant, this gave 101 in each group, including a total of 303 women.

Results: Mean estimated pain scores on VAS (SC: 69.0, MA: 66.4 and EA: 68.5), adjusted for: treatment, age, education, and time from baseline, with no interactions did not differ between the groups (SC vs MA: mean difference 2.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.7-6.9 and SC vs EA: mean difference 0.6 [95% CI] -3.6-4.8). Fewer number of women in the EA group used epidural analgesia (46%) than women in the MA group (61%) and SC group (70%) (EA vs SC: odds ratio [OR] 0.35; [95% CI] 0.19-0.67).

Conclusions: Acupuncture does not reduce women’s experience of labour pain, neither with manual stimulation nor with combined manual and electrical stimulation. However, fewer women in the EA group used epidural analgesia thus indicating that the effect of acupuncture with electrical stimulation may be underestimated.

These findings were obtained in a context with free access to other forms of pain relief.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2014. Vol. 14, 187
Keyword [en]
acupuncture; childbirth; pain; complementary methods
National Category
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Research subject
Medical sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-10104DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-187ISI: 000337323400001PubMedID: 24913704Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84902551771OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-10104DiVA: diva2:756726
Available from: 2014-10-19 Created: 2014-10-19 Last updated: 2015-08-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(563 kB)325 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 563 kBChecksum SHA-512
0614f364e797b6d86944a751b0a57e1bab0804155d38967d5bc5c2deb8dcca4a6cf6b0c71da638aef977e4406405b1f1d82c09d8cd12c340a5356cb3be02f17b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusLänk till fulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mårtensson, Lena B.
By organisation
School of Health and EducationHealth and Education
In the same journal
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 325 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 619 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf