Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Overlapping Ergonomic Evaluation in the Automotive Design Process
University of Skövde, Department of Engineering Science. (User Centred Product Design)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4596-3815
Loughborough University.
University of Skövde, Department of Engineering Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3108-6893
2002 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Ergonomic evaluation typically comes late in the automotive design process, often not performed until physical mock-ups are produced. This may lead to expensive and cumbersome iterations, or to reductions of the final product quality due to low priority of meeting set ergonomic requirements. Computer aided design (CAD) is intensively used for design in the automotive industry. Performance and usability of computers and software are improving at a rapid pace, which enables CAD to be employed even more intensively. This encourages a digital design process where expensive, inflexible and time consuming physical mock-ups are only built at the end of the design process. This incorporates the risk that ergonomic evaluation will be put back even further. A way to address this problem is to enable ergonomics to be evaluated in the digital design process - in a virtual product. However, in many cases, evaluation made in a physical prototype is unbeatable in establishing ergonomic conditions. This paper discusses possible advantages of moving ergonomic evaluation earlier in the automotive design process by implementing planned overlapping strategies. It also shows initial results from a project at a car company, which aims at improving ergonomics integration in the automotive design process, e.g. by looking at task overlapping. These strategies are believed to be applicable both for evaluations made in a virtual environment and evaluations performed in the real world.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2002. p. 233-241
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-10045ISBN: 0853898227 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-10045DiVA, id: diva2:751801
Conference
International Manufacturing Conference, IMC19, Queen's University, Belfast, August 2002.
Available from: 2014-10-02 Created: 2014-10-02 Last updated: 2023-03-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Hogberg_IMC2002(291 kB)1194 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 291 kBChecksum SHA-512
7589cb1884992a0f38bd6806a270bf40110ede0a267d5ba61c39e43f5fdf3c387ca09864ebb145f018540d830bd4077ef9d731a164f067a217580cf02c7f39e8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Högberg, DanCase, KeithDe Vin, Leo J.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Högberg, DanCase, KeithDe Vin, Leo J.
By organisation
Department of Engineering Science
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1194 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1166 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf