Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Developing paradoxical guidelines for communities of practice in organizations
University of Skövde, School of Humanities and Informatics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0488-6841
University of Nebraska, Omaha, USA.
University of Groningen, Netherlands.
2006 (English)In: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006, Association for Information Systems, 2006, article id 159Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Communities of practice (CoPs) have been identified as a means to enable acquisition and sharing of tacit knowledge in organizations. CoPs complement or even replace approaches where the focus is on storing and retrieving codified knowledge in documents and systems. This paper highlights some of the problematic aspects of using CoPs as a tool to improve knowledge sharing. Theories on coordination are put forward as a theoretical frame to explain the role of CoPs in organizational functioning. Our study of CoPs in the Amsterdam Police Force shows how CoPs in organizations face several dilemmas. How can CoPs be self-directing and simultaneously contribute to organizational performance? How can they utilize the IT opportunities of contacting anybody, any time, any place and simultaneously circumvent the threats of low commitment and poor mutual understanding in virtual groups? How can members of CoPs produce shared repertoire without falling in the trap of groupthink? How can CoPs act as environments for sharing tacit as well as explicit knowledge? Coordination theory suggests how members of CoPs in organizations can deal with such competing values by making situational choices that reflect paradoxical guidelines. We discuss how police officers use such paradoxical guidelines in organizational prototyping sessions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Association for Information Systems, 2006. article id 159
Series
ECIS Proceedings, E-ISSN 2184-1934
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-7222Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84870651069OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-7222DiVA, id: diva2:605128
Conference
14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006, Göteborg, 12 June 2006 through 14 June 2006
Available from: 2013-02-13 Created: 2013-02-13 Last updated: 2025-01-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

ScopusFulltext

Authority records

van Laere, Joeri

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
van Laere, Joeri
By organisation
School of Humanities and Informatics
Information Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 973 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf