Shifting focus from distributive to procedural justice, this chapter by Ali Kazemi, Maedeh Gholamzadehmir, and Kjell Törnblom starts from the proposition that in a situation of procedural injustice, restoration of justice will be attempted via behaviors that are isomorphic with the resource with which the violated procedural rule is isomorphic. An empirical illustration corroborated in large this novel line of reasoning and showed that when the procedural rule of voice was violated, restoration of justice was attempted via status isomorphic behaviors. This is consistent with Foa’s proposal that people prefer to retaliate a loss via a resource class proximal rather than distal to the lost resource. The proposition that inaccuracy is isomorphic with information, that is, a universalistic resource received mixed support. The notion that procedural injustice has implications for discrete emotions was supported. Regardless of the resource of deprivation, the denial of voice had greater impact than inaccuracy of decisions which, in turn, suggests a greater impact of particularistic (i.e., status) than of universalistic (i.e., information) resource deprivation.