his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Konsekvenser av rollövertagandet: ”I”, ”me” och individualiteten
University of Skövde, School of Technology and Society.
2011 (Swedish)In: Sociologisk forskning, ISSN 0038-0342, Vol. 48, no 2, 7-28 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper analyzes the tendency of taking the ”I” and the ”me” in G . H . Meads theory of role taking as two separate, qualitatively different parts of human personality, the ”I” being of individual origin, the ”me” of social . In the original Meadian sense role taking gives rise to both the ”I” and the ”me” . They are dialectically united rather than dualistically separated aspects . They refer to the joint functional power of the subject, finding itself as an object, mediated by the Other . As a consequence, the link between body and the social world be-comes theoretically more stringent, as the body is given its place as a cognitive social object among others, this by contrast to interpretations where the body is left as an object mainly outside the human social experience and as a source of agency sui generis, a conception which is in opposition to Meads.The stress on the ”I”-phase, as related to body and concrete action in combination with its direct relation to the ”me”-phase, actualizes Mead as a forerunner in modern biologic/neu-rologic research on human perceptual, motivational and intentional capacity .Swedish Mead interpreters are critically analyzed . Interpretations of Charon, Giddens, Joas and Habermas are partly scrutinized.The author defines the conceptual pair in terms of activity, subjectivity, temporal relati-vity and distance .

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sveriges Sociologförbund , 2011. Vol. 48, no 2, 7-28 p.
Keyword [en]
Role taking, the ”I” and the ”me”, temporal and spatial distance, dualism – dialectic, subject and object
National Category
Social Sciences
Research subject
Humanities and Social sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-7157ISI: 000291964700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84864735513OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-7157DiVA: diva2:604034
Available from: 2013-02-07 Created: 2013-02-07 Last updated: 2015-12-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

ScopusLänk till fulltextLänk till fulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berg, Lars-Erik
By organisation
School of Technology and Society
In the same journal
Sociologisk forskning
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 613 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf