his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Mutation Testing: A comparison of mutation selection methods
University of Skövde, School of Humanities and Informatics.
2012 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Software is all around us in our lives in the industrialized world, and we as a society and individuals need it to function correctly. Software testing fills the role of performing behavior audits, to guide the correction of the software to its intended behavior. The consequences of faulty software can range to the late arrival of trains, to nuclear meltdowns.

This places quality requirements on the software of various levels. Program based mutation testing provides a high level of faultfinding capability. It does this by injecting many synthetic faults into the code under test, as described by mutation operators. These faults are used to search for testcases that would identify such faults, and consequently find real faults that the synthetic faults mimic.

However, mutation testing is costly on three accounts; each mutant of the original code is compiled, each mutant should ideally have an associated testcase to reveal that fault the mutant contains, finally the testcases are analyzed thoroughly by looking the output of the original and mutants to reveal the error in behavior.

In order to reduce cost while maintaining a high level of faultfinding, selective mutation testing is investigated, it uses a subset of all the available mutation operators. The investigation found that using Absolute value-, and Relational operator-, mutation reduces cost of mutation testing by 80%, while uncovering 83% of the injected faults.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 82 p.
Keyword [en]
Software Testing, Mutation, Testing Effectiveness, Selective Mutation
Keyword [sv]
Mjukvarutestning, Mutation, Testeffektivitet, Utvald Mutation
National Category
Computer Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-6569OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-6569DiVA: diva2:562326
Subject / course
Computer Science
Educational program
Informatics - Master's Programme
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2012-11-23 Created: 2012-10-24 Last updated: 2012-11-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Mutation testing: A comparison of mutation selection methods(1699 kB)2137 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1699 kBChecksum SHA-512
7ae23730ccba0206bbb87b800998d68961610eefb71a92a7b0bc050c4faf6eea6664652ac1b553e8b76992f01a3b9cbf6129c3ea4476134e38e09a80a2706c6f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hagman, Hans
By organisation
School of Humanities and Informatics
Computer Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2137 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 204 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf