Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cross sectional study of Australian midwives knowledge and use of sterile water injections for pain relief in labour
Australian Catholic University, Qld 4014, Australia.
University of Skövde, School of Life Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0079-3966
Australian Catholic University, Qld 4014, Australia ; Mater Medical Research Institute, Qld 4101, Australia.
2012 (English)In: Women and Birth, ISSN 1871-5192, E-ISSN 1878-1799, Vol. 25, no 4, p. e75-e80Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The effectiveness of sterile water injections (SWI) to relieve back pain in labour is supported by a number of randomised controlled trials. Although the procedure is available in a number of Australian maternity units, there is no information regarding the use of SWI by midwives, in terms of knowledge and availability, clinical application or technique used. Neither is there any data on midwives who do not use SWI nor the specific challengers and barriers encountered by midwives introducing SWI.

Method: An invitation to participate in an online survey was emailed to 4700 members of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM) and 484 members of CRANAplus (Remote Health Organisation). Nine hundred and seventy midwives completed the survey (19%).

Results: Four hundred and seven (42.5%) midwives currently used SWI in their practice and five hundred and fifty-one (57.5%) indicated they did not. Eighty-six percent (n = 478/548) indicated they would consider using SWI and 90% (n = 500/547) were interested in obtaining further information about SWI. The main reasons cited for not using SWI was the lack of a policy or guideline (n = 271, 57.5%) and being unable to access workshops or resource material (n = 68, 14.4%).

Conclusion: This study indicates that SWI is not being used by the majority of midwives participating in the study, although there is a strong desire by midwives to learn about and explore its use. Greater access to information and workshops on SWI is highlighted. In response to the findings of this survey the authors are currently developing an online resource and training to support units to introduce SWI.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2012. Vol. 25, no 4, p. e75-e80
Keywords [en]
Sterile water injections, Labour, Pain relief, Midwifery practice
National Category
Nursing Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Research subject
Medical sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-5885DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2011.11.002ISI: 000315741800005PubMedID: 22222092Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84869883350OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-5885DiVA, id: diva2:527469
Available from: 2012-05-21 Created: 2012-05-21 Last updated: 2023-07-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mårtensson, Lena B.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mårtensson, Lena B.
By organisation
School of Life Sciences
In the same journal
Women and Birth
NursingObstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 883 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf