his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
e-Governance in public sector ICT procurement: what is shaping practice in Sweden?
University of Skövde, School of Humanities and Informatics. University of Skövde, The Informatics Research Centre.
2011 (English)In: European Journal of ePractice, ISSN 1988-625X, E-ISSN 1988-625X, Vol. 12, no 6, 66-78 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Is it reasonable to require any person or organisation to purchase specific software in order to be able to communicate with a governmental organisation? This question is at the heart of an ongoing debate in many countries within the EU, because of its implications for accessibility, transparency, democracy, and fairness in procurement and markets. In this paper we consider the inability of many Swedish governmental organisations to communicate in open formats, and report on an investigation into policy formulation which has led to this situation in one sector – local government. We conducted a survey of all municipalities in Sweden. The final response rate was 99%, after 4 months and a maximum of 7 reminders. We find that there is little or no evidence of consideration given to document formats when procuring software. And in a large majority of cases, there is no documentation of any decision process. Further, organisational adoption of application suites seems more influenced by tradition and a desire to upgrade existing IT infrastructure than by any form of analysis and evaluation prior to purchase. In several municipalities specific applications are even named in procurements, which is in conflict with EU directives. There is also considerable confusion amongst respondents related to the difference between application and file format. We make a number of recommendations. Evaluation of document formats should always precede decisions on application and should include interoperability and lock-in considerations. Municipalities must take responsibility for the evaluation of both document formats and office applications before adoption. Further, when assessing the total cost of ownership the analysis should include consideration of exit costs in the procurement. The study highlights a lack of strategic decision making with respect to accessibility, and a resultant lack of transparency with respect to ICT procurement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
ePractice.eu , 2011. Vol. 12, no 6, 66-78 p.
Keyword [en]
Open Standards, IT-procurement, office applications, survey, current practice
National Category
Computer and Information Science
Research subject
Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-5201OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-5201DiVA: diva2:470191
Available from: 2011-12-28 Created: 2011-07-04 Last updated: 2017-01-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Länk till fulltext (hela numret)

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundell, Björn
By organisation
School of Humanities and InformaticsThe Informatics Research Centre
In the same journal
European Journal of ePractice
Computer and Information Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 82 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf