Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Beyond the bounds of cognition
University of Skövde, School of Humanities and Informatics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8325-5890
University of Skövde, School of Humanities and Informatics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0946-7531
University of Skövde, School of Humanities and Informatics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6883-2450
2003 (English)In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, New York: Psychology Press, 2003, p. 1134-1139Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Psychology Press, 2003. p. 1134-1139
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-1654DOI: 10.4324/9781315799360-72ISI: 000232001900211ISBN: 9781315799360 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-1654DiVA, id: diva2:31930
Conference
25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA, July 31-August 02, 2003
Note

One of the questions that frequently come up in discussions of situated, embodied and distributed cognition is where to draw the boundary between cognisers and their environment. Adams and Aizawa (2001) have recently formulated a critique of what they consider a "radical view of tool use", i.e., the view of tools as part of the cognitive system. We analyse their critique and show that much of what they consider 'radical' turns out to be compatible with what they consider 'common sense'. Hence, we argue that much of the debate boils down to a disagreement over different uses of the term 'cognitive', whereas there is growing agreement about the central role that agent-environment interaction in general, and tool use in particular, play in cognitive processes. We therefore suggest to drop the 'bounds of cognition' debate, and conclude by raising what we consider more important questions in the study of cognitive tool use.

Available from: 2007-10-01 Created: 2007-10-01 Last updated: 2024-09-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Susi, TarjaLindblom, JessicaZiemke, Tom

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Susi, TarjaLindblom, JessicaZiemke, Tom
By organisation
School of Humanities and Informatics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1147 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf