his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Strategies of pain assessment used by nurses on surgical units
College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, 2 Heathman Road, White Hall, Kingston, RI 02881-2021, United States / Buskerud University College, Drammen, Norway.
College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, 2 Heathman Road, White Hall, Kingston, RI 02881-2021, United States.
College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, 2 Heathman Road, White Hall, Kingston, RI 02881-2021, United States.
College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, 2 Heathman Road, White Hall, Kingston, RI 02881-2021, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2005 (English)In: Pain Management Nursing, ISSN 1524-9042, E-ISSN 1532-8635, Vol. 6, no 1, 3-9 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this study was to identify the criteria nurses actually used to assess postoperative pain and the kind of knowledge they drew on from past experience. A series of semistructured interviews were performed with 10 nurses while they conducted pain assessments with 30 postsurgical patients. Data were analyzed on the basis of Dahlgren and Fallsberg’s (1991) analytic approach called phenomenography. Findings were compared with Sjöström’s 1995 study of nurses in Sweden. Nurses in this study, much like the group in Sweden, used three categories of criteria (i.e., how the patient looked, what the patient said, and experience with similar circumstances) and drew on their past experiences in four different ways (i.e., in terms of a typology of patients, a focus on listening to patients, what to look for, and what to do for patients) when assessing postoperative pain. In the most frequently reported strategy, nurses relied on criteria related to the patient’s appearance and drew on their past experience in terms of what physical signs to look for (e.g., facial expressions, bodily movement, and heart rate). The variety of strategies used by nurses in this study opens an avenue for further investigating the linkage between underlying conceptions of pain (as essentially subjective vs. objective phenomenon) and the quality and effectiveness of nurses’ assessments of pain and its management in postoperative and other contexts across nursing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2005. Vol. 6, no 1, 3-9 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-1619DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2004.12.001PubMedID: 15917739Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-19144369317OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-1619DiVA: diva2:31895
Available from: 2007-08-01 Created: 2007-08-01 Last updated: 2013-04-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopushttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1524904204001596

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sjöström, Björn
By organisation
School of Life Sciences
In the same journal
Pain Management Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 41 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf