his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Two Approaches to Event Detection in Active Database Systems
University of Skövde, Department of Computer Science.
2001 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year))Student thesis
Abstract [en]

An active database management system can react to predefined events in the database, resulting in performing some appropriate action. ECA-rules are used to capture these predefined events and to express the appropriate action in the active database management system. An event is said to be an atomic occurrence and is either primitive or composite. D-SNOOP and O-SNOOP are two ways to describe the semantics of composite events. D-SNOOP is detection-based (an event is considered to be instantaneous) and O-SNOOP occurrence-based (an event is considered to occur over a time interval). Some problems concerning the detection of composite events using D-SNOOP semantics have been highlighted by Galton and Augusto (2001), who have created the O-SNOOP semantics to rectify some of the shortcomings of D-SNOOP. It is, however, not known what practical consequences O-SNOOP has on applications. To find some of these practical consequences, an advanced application that uses composite events must be used. In this work, the advanced application is a cooperative information system.

A cooperative information system is a system in which several agents work together to solve some common problem. The agents can take on a role as either manager (service requester) or agent (problem solver).

In this dissertation an investigation of the differences between O-SNOOP and D-SNOOP in applications handling cooperation protocols is presented. Our first objective has been to model a cooperation protocol using in turn the D-SNOOP and the O-SNOOP semantics. A further objective has been to compare the models of the cooperation protocols to identify any differences between using D-SNOOP and O-SNOOP semantics in applications handling cooperation protocols.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Skövde: Institutionen för datavetenskap , 2001. , 139 p.
Keyword [en]
Active Database Systems, D-SNOOP, O-SNOOP
National Category
Information Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-628OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-628DiVA: diva2:3019
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Available from: 2008-01-30 Created: 2008-01-30 Last updated: 2010-02-05

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(7048 kB)125 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 7048 kBChecksum SHA-512
836a192880322ebd14ed7ac5074a08eca429e6283d03735c0b8de47e3a4e6ce6d52eaa55835afcc774e1ac25b73b9f35897393a423b7ada740e216c5f22cc160
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Computer Science
Information Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 169 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 273 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf