his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Merging Modelling Techniques: A Case Study and its Implications
University of Skövde, Department of Computer Science.
1999 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year))Student thesis
Abstract [en]

There are a countless number of methods in the field of Information Systems Development (ISD) today, where only a few have received much attention by practitioners. These ISD methods are described and developed using knowledge in the field of Method Engineering (ME). Most methods concern either what a system is to contain or how the system is to be realised, but as of now, there is no best method for all situations. Bridging the gap between the fuzzier "what"-methods and the more formal "how"-methods is difficult, if not impossible. Methods therefore need to be integrated to cover as much of the systems life cycle as possible. An integration of two methods, one from each side of the gap, can be performed in a number of different ways, each way having its own obstacles that need to be overcome.

The case study we have performed concerns a method integration of the fuzzier Business Process Model (BPM) in the EKD method with the more formal description technique SDL (Specification and Description Language). One meta model per technique was created, which were then used to compare BPM and SDL. The integration process consisted of translating EKD business process diagrams into SDL correspondences, while carefully documenting and analysing encountered problems. The encountered problems mainly arose because of either transaction-independence differences or method focus deviations. The case study resulted in, for example, a number of implications for both EKD and SDL, as well as for ME, and include suggestions for future work.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Skövde: Institutionen för datavetenskap , 1999. , 134 p.
Keyword [en]
ISDM, Method Engineering, Method integration, EKD, SDL
National Category
Information Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-393OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-393DiVA: diva2:2763
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Available from: 2007-12-12 Created: 2007-12-12 Last updated: 2010-02-12

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(10761 kB)91 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 10761 kBChecksum SHA-512
dc33b65089fe1bdbe958843528bcd0f1ea5f74714b87e8b21482aeb00457dee6f3680ddeae910586b0f7db2c708639d2c791d36de56ef1b53ce2cdb0e3e885c9
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Computer Science
Information Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 224 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 215 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf