his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evolving Decision Trees Using Oracle Guides
School of Business and Informatics, University of Borås, Sweden.
University of Skövde, School of Humanities and Informatics. University of Skövde, The Informatics Research Centre.
2009 (English)In: 2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM 2009) Proceedings, IEEE, 2009, 238-244 p.Conference paper, (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Some data mining problems require predictive models to be not only accurate but also comprehensible. Comprehensibility enables human inspection and understanding of the model, making it possible to trace why individual predictions are made. Since most high-accuracy techniques produce opaque models, accuracy is, in practice, regularly sacrificed for comprehensibility. One frequently studied technique, often able to reduce this accuracy vs. comprehensibility tradeoff, is rule extraction, i.e., the activity where another, transparent, model is generated from the opaque. In this paper, it is argued that techniques producing transparent models, either directly from the dataset, or from an opaque model, could benefit from using an oracle guide. In the experiments, genetic programming is used to evolve decision trees, and a neural network ensemble is used as the oracle guide. More specifically, the datasets used by the genetic programming when evolving the decision trees, consist of several different combinations of the original training data and "oracle data", i.e., training or test data instances, together with corresponding predictions from the oracle. In total, seven different ways of combining regular training data with oracle data were evaluated, and the results, obtained on 26 UCI datasets, clearly show that the use of an oracle guide improved the performance. As a matter of fact, trees evolved using training data only had the worst test set accuracy of all setups evaluated. Furthermore, statistical tests show that two setups, both using the oracle guide, produced significantly more accurate trees, compared to the setup using training data only.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE, 2009. 238-244 p.
National Category
Computer and Information Science
Research subject
Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-3209DOI: 10.1109/CIDM.2009.4938655ISI: 000271487700034Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-67650505073ISBN: 978-1-4244-2765-9 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-3209DiVA: diva2:225362
Conference
2009 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM 2009), March 30-April 2, 2009, Sheraton Music City Hotel, Nashville, TN, USA
Available from: 2009-06-26 Created: 2009-06-26 Last updated: 2017-06-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusExternal link to full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Niklasson, Lars
By organisation
School of Humanities and InformaticsThe Informatics Research Centre
Computer and Information Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 333 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf