Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Certified Registered Nurse Anaesthetists’ and Critical Care Registered Nurses’ perception of knowledge/power in teamwork with Anaesthesiologists in Sweden: a mixed-method study
University of Skövde, School of Health Sciences. University of Skövde, Digital Health Research (DHEAR). (Wellbeing in Long-term Health Problems (WeLHP))ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5724-9630
Region Västra Götaland, Skaraborgs Hospital Skövde, Dept of Anesthesia, Skövde, Sweden.
University of Skövde, School of Health Sciences. University of Skövde, Digital Health Research (DHEAR). (Wellbeing in Long-term Health Problems (WeLHP))ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1819-0896
Department of Social Work and Criminology, University of Gävle, Sweden.
2024 (English)In: BMC Nursing, E-ISSN 1472-6955, Vol. 23, article id 7Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Efficient teamwork is crucial to provide optimal health care. This paper focuses on teamwork between Anaesthesiologists (ANES), Certified Registered Nurse Anaesthetists’ (CRNA) and Critical Care Registered Nurses (CCRN) working in challenging environments such as the intensive care unit (ICU) and the operating room (OR). Conflicts are common between physicians and nurses, negatively impacting teamwork. Social hierarchies based on professional status and power inequalities between nurses and physicians plays a vital role in influencing teamwork. Foucault was a famous thinker especially known for his reasoning regarding power/knowledge. A Foucauldian perspective was therefore incorporated into this paper and the overall aim was to explore CCRN/CRNA perception of knowledge/power in teamwork with ANES.

Methods A mixed-method approach was applied in this study. Data was collected using a web-based questionnaire containing both closed-end and open-ended questions. A total of 289 CCRNs and CRNAs completed the questionnaire. Data analysis was then conducted through five stages as outlined by Onwuebugzie and Teddlie; analysing quantitative data in SPSS 27.0 and qualitative data with a directed content analysis, finally merging data together in ATLAS.ti v.23.

Results The result reveals a dissonance between quantitative and qualitative data; quantitative data indicates a well-functioning interdisciplinary teamwork between CCRN/CRNA and ANES - qualitative data highlights that there are several barriers and inequalities between the two groups. Medicine was perceived as superior to nursing, which was reinforced by both social and organisational structures at the ICU and OR.

Conclusion Unconscious rules underlying current power structures in the ICU and OR works in favour of the ANES and biomedical paradigm, supporting medical knowledge. To achieve a more equal power distribution between CCRN/CRNAs and ANES, the structural hierarchies between nursing and medicine needs to be addressed. A more equal power balance between the two disciplines can improve teamwork and thereby reduce patient mortality and improve patient outcomes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024. Vol. 23, article id 7
Keywords [en]
Anaesthesiologist, Nurse anaesthetist, CRNA, Critical care nurse, CCRN, Team
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Wellbeing in long-term health problems (WeLHP)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-23498DOI: 10.1186/s12912-023-01677-zISI: 001134649600009PubMedID: 38163862Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85180820364OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-23498DiVA, id: diva2:1823303
Funder
University of Skövde
Note

CC BY 4.0

Correspondence: Jenny Wising jenny.wising@his.se

Open access funding provided by University of Skövde. This study received no specifc grant from any funding agency.

Available from: 2024-01-02 Created: 2024-01-02 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1663 kB)89 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1663 kBChecksum SHA-512
8644d7733506ae450ac89e00be552f0b5449d233e57857648da914c05d47fb981cb4972fafc4aecdcdecd9140018a535af949668374f95b25d633e7529f97ccb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Wising, JennyHallgren, Jenny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wising, JennyHallgren, Jenny
By organisation
School of Health SciencesDigital Health Research (DHEAR)
In the same journal
BMC Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 89 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 277 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf