Some Notes on Workplace Equality Renewal in the Swedish Labour Market
2006 (English)In: Gender, Work and Organization, ISSN 0968-6673, E-ISSN 1468-0432, Vol. 13, no 6, p. 606-620Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
In 2001, Swedish authorities imposed a new obligation upon all firms with ten or more employees to undertake annual wage surveys, ‘workplace equality audits’ in which it is possible to ascertain, remedy and prevent unwarranted wage differentials and other unfair employment terms between men and women. An important implication of the new system, called ‘workplace equality renewal’ (självsanering), is that, at the level of the firm all Swedish employers must explain what they mean by work of ‘equal value’ as opposed to ‘different value’. This article discusses the practical pros and cons of the new system, and considers how the surveys can be used in research into the present state of gendered work division. A main finding is that the introduction of this new legislation in the long run might change the Swedish industrial relations system as well as the preconditions for many companies’ human resource management policies. Yet, neither the governmental agencies involved nor the parties’ confederate organizations have been able to clarify what the issue is really about to the single, small business employer or to the local trade union branches. Many employers find any interference, whatever it may be, threatening and trade unions have not realized the potentialities of the system from an employee perspective, potentialities connected to the fact that companies are now more or less forced to make transparent their wage policies at large.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell Publishing, 2006. Vol. 13, no 6, p. 606-620
Keywords [en]
gender pay differentials, labour market legislation, legally imposed wage audits, Swedish industrial relations
National Category
Work Sciences Law (excluding Law and Society)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-23338DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00324.xISI: 000241159600006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-33749621732OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-23338DiVA, id: diva2:1808882
Note
This article draws on findings from a project financed by the Swedish research fund Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap (the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research) (FAS), and undertaken at the University College Trollhättan-Uddevalla. The authors are grateful to Rachel Annand, Paul Stewart, Eberhardt Stüber, the editors and three anonymous referees for helpful comments on previous drafts.
2023-11-012023-11-012023-11-01Bibliographically approved