Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evolutionary aspects of the genomic organization of rat chromosome 10
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Lundberg Laboratory, Göteborg University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2525-3752
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Lundberg Laboratory, Göteborg University, Sweden.
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Lundberg Laboratory, Göteborg University, Sweden.
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Lundberg Laboratory, Göteborg University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2002 (English)In: Cytogenetic and Genome Research, ISSN 1424-8581, E-ISSN 1424-859X, Vol. 96, no 1-4, p. 52-59Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Using FISH and RH mapping a chromosomal map of rat chromosome 10 (RNO10) was constructed. Our mapping data were complemented by other published data and the final map was compared to maps of mouse and human chromosomes. RNO10 contained segments homologous to mouse chromosomes (MMU) 11, 16 and 17, with evolutionary breakpoints between the three segments situated in the proximal part of RNO10. Near one of these breakpoints (between MMU17 and 11) we found evidence for an inversion ancestral to the mouse that was not ancestral to the condition in the rat. Within each of the chromosome segments identified, the gene order appeared to be largely conserved. This conservation was particularly clear in the long MMU11-homologous segment. RNO10 also contained segments homologous to three human chromosomes (HSA5, 16, 17). However, within each segment of conserved synteny were signs of more extensive rearrangements. At least 13 different evolutionary breakpoints were indicated in the rat-human comparison. In contrast to what was found between rat and mouse, the rat-human evolutionary breaks were distributed along the entire length of RNO10.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
S. Karger, 2002. Vol. 96, no 1-4, p. 52-59
National Category
Genetics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-23018DOI: 10.1159/000063052ISI: 000178731700009PubMedID: 12438780Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0036043749OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-23018DiVA, id: diva2:1781574
Note

This article was originally published in Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics

Available from: 2023-07-10 Created: 2023-07-10 Last updated: 2023-07-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Behboudi, AfrouzKlinga-Levan, Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Behboudi, AfrouzKlinga-Levan, Karin
In the same journal
Cytogenetic and Genome Research
Genetics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf