Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Promoting Air Quality Policy Adoption and Change
School of Psychology, University of Leeds, UK.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7380-1536
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Air pollution is a localised issue but negatively influences health and finance globally. Conurbations and regional governments struggle to find the best policy solutions to meet air quality limit levels while competing over resources and attempting to secure growth. As such, methods to increase the adoption of effective pollution-focused policies are warranted. This thesis has set out to create a framework for understanding the relationship between behaviour change of policy makers and the adoption of new air quality policies at regional levels of government. Chapter four of this thesis looked into the quality and results of previous literature through a systematic review (study 1), investigating how previous interventions have attempted to promote policy adoption. Within chapter five, a vignette study with policy practitioners (study 2; n = 15) was conducted to evaluate the use of intervention functions. Alongside the vignette study, an online questionnaire looked at perceived barriers to policy adoption. Data from both were amalgamated using thematic analysis. Finally, in chapter six, the use of interventions to promote air quality policy and the state of current UK air quality policy was reviewed (study 3). Collectively these studies have contributed to the understanding of how intervention functions influence policy intention formation and policy adoption. The combined outcomes of these studies suggest a) a need for increased education of policymakers and b) for councils to share learning and take inspiration from each other. Throughout the studies, key barriers to policy intentions and policy adoption were investigated, the most prominent being economic and administrative barriers. Within chapter seven, results are summarised and directions for future research and practice are suggested.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
University of Leeds , 2021. , p. xi, 254
National Category
Public Administration Studies Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology Occupational Health and Environmental Health Applied Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-21765OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-21765DiVA, id: diva2:1693172
Public defence
2021-04-21, online, 14:30 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Available from: 2022-09-06 Created: 2022-09-06 Last updated: 2022-09-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Fulltext

Authority records

Bank, Sakarias Einar Sefik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bank, Sakarias Einar Sefik
Public Administration StudiesSocial Sciences InterdisciplinaryPublic Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and EpidemiologyOccupational Health and Environmental HealthApplied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 114 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf