Cost-effectiveness calculators for health, well-being and safety promotion: a systematic reviewShow others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: European Journal of Public Health, ISSN 1101-1262, E-ISSN 1464-360X, Vol. 31, no 5, p. 997-1003Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
BACKGROUND: The health, well-being and safety of the general population are important goals for society, but forecasting outcomes and weighing up the costs and benefits of effective promotional programmes is challenging. This study aimed to identify and describe the cost-effectiveness calculators that analyze interventions that promote health, well-being and safety. METHODS: Our systematic review used the CINAHL, PsycINFO, SocINDEX, EconLit, PubMed and Scopus databases to identify peer-reviewed studies published in English between January 2010 and April 2020. The data were analyzed with narrative synthesis. RESULTS: The searches identified 6880 papers and nine met our eligibility and quality criteria. All nine calculators focussed on interventions that promoted health and well-being, but no safety promotion tools were identified. Five calculators were targeted at group-level initiatives, two at regional levels and two at national levels. The calculators combined different data sources, in addition to data inputted by users. This included empirical research and previous literature. The calculators created baseline estimates and assessed the cost-effectiveness of the interventions before or after they were implemented. The calculators were heterogeneous in terms of outcomes, the interventions they evaluated and the data and methods used. CONCLUSION: This review identified nine calculators that assessed the cost-effectiveness of health and well-being interventions and supported decision-making and resource allocations at local, regional and national levels, but none focussed on safety. Producing calculators that work accurately in different contexts might be challenging. Further research should identify how to assess sustainable evaluation of health, well-being and safety strategies.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2021. Vol. 31, no 5, p. 997-1003
Keywords [en]
article, Cinahl, cost effectiveness analysis, decision making, drug safety, eligibility, empirical research, human, Medline, narrative, outcome assessment, PsycINFO, resource allocation, Scopus, synthesis, systematic review, wellbeing
National Category
Nursing Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Research subject
Research on Citizen Centered Health, University of Skövde (Reacch US)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20789DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab068ISI: 000741841100015PubMedID: 33970246Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85120833947OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-20789DiVA, id: diva2:1620789
Note
CC BY 4.0
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
Correspondence: Marja Hult, Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Joukahaisenkatu 3–5, Turku 20014, Finland, Tel: +358 (0) 40 06 91431, e-mail: marja.hult@iki.fi
Editor's choice
2021-12-162021-12-162022-04-11Bibliographically approved