Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of Undersampling Methods for Prediction of Casting Defects Based on Process Parameters
University of Skövde, School of Engineering Science.
2021 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 12 credits / 18 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Prediction of both big and small decisions is something most companies have to make on a daily basis. The importance of having a highly accurate technique for different decision-making is not something that is new. However, even though the importance of prediction is a fact to most people, current techniques for estimation are still often highly inaccurate. The consequences of an inaccurate prediction can be huge in the differences between the misclassifications. Not just in the industry but for many different areas. Machine learning have in the recent couple of years improved significantly and are now considered a reliable method to use for prediction. The main goal of this research is to predict casting defects with the help of a machine-learning algorithm based on process parameters. In order to achieve the main goal, some sub-objectives have been identified to successfully reach those goals. A problem when dealing with machine learning is an unbalanced dataset. When training a network, it is essential that the dataset is balanced. In this research we have successfully balanced the dataset. Undersampling was the method used in our research to establish our balanced dataset. The research compares and evaluates a couple of different undersample methods in order to see which undersampling is best suited for this project. Three different machine models, “random forest”, “artificial neural network”, and “k-nearest neighbor”, are also compared to each other to see what model performs best. The conlcusion reached was that the best method for both undersampling and machine learning model varied due to many different reasons. So, in order to find the best model with the best method for a specific job, all the models and methods need to be tested. However, the undersampling method that provided best performances most times in our research was the NearMiss version 2 model. Artificial Neural Network was the machine learning model that had most success in our research. It performed best in two out of three evaluations and comparisons. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. , p. 81
Keywords [en]
Machine learning, casting defects, undersampling, random forest, artificial neural network
National Category
Robotics Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20596OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-20596DiVA, id: diva2:1597599
External cooperation
Scania
Subject / course
Virtual Product Realization
Educational program
Intelligent Automation - Master's Programme, 60 ECTS
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2021-09-27 Created: 2021-09-27 Last updated: 2021-09-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1651 kB)2157 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1651 kBChecksum SHA-512
4ec83a60dd36004fdc8c8c12ae3c0b36638b549c089fc48fd54ce3ab4ac4740eb06b90e70378da051474cadb852f41e71efdd43f0ac99f14438074f9f4b83350
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Engineering Science
RoboticsComputer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2158 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 637 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf