Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinical factors of importance for outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: long-term follow-up
Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Orthopaedics, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland.
Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: European spine journal, ISSN 0940-6719, E-ISSN 1432-0932, Vol. 19, no 9, p. 1459-1467Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Factors as age, sex, smoking, duration of leg pain, working status, type/level of disc herniation and psychosocial factors have been demonstrated to be of importance for short-term results after lumbar discectomy. There are few studies with long-term follow-up. In this prospective study of lumbar disc herniation patients undergoing surgery, the result was evaluated at 2 and 5-10 (mean 7.3) years after surgery. Predictive factors for satisfaction with treatment and objective outcome were investigated. Out of the included 171 patients undergoing lumbar discectomy, 154 (90%) patients completed the 2-year follow-up and 140 (81%) completed the long-term follow-up. Baseline data and questionnaires about leg- and back pain intensity (VAS), duration of leg pain, disability (Oswestry Disability Index), depression (Zung Depression Scale), sick leave and employment status were obtained preoperatively, at 2-year- and long-term follow-up. Primary outcome included patient satisfaction with treatment (at both time points) and assessment of an independent observer at the 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes at 2-year follow-up were improvement of leg and back pain, working capacity and the need for analgesics or sleeping pills. In about 70% of the patients excellent or good overall result was reported at both follow-ups, with subjective outcome measurements. The objective evaluation after 2 years was in agreement with this result. Time on sick leave was found to be a clinically important predictor of the primary outcomes, with a potential of changing the probability of a satisfactory outcome (both objective and subjective) from around 50% (sick leave >3 months) to 80% (sick leave <2 months). Time on sick leave was also an important predictor for several of the secondary outcomes; e.g. working capacity and the need for analgesics.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2010. Vol. 19, no 9, p. 1459-1467
Keywords [en]
Clinical outcome, Disc herniation, Long-term follow-up, Predictive factor, Surgery
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20361DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1433-7ISI: 000281381500005PubMedID: 20512513Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-77956921252OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-20361DiVA, id: diva2:1583903
Note

An Erratum to this article was published on 17 July 2010

Silverplats, K., Lind, B., Zoëga, B. et al. Erratum to: Clinical factors of importance for outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: long-term follow-up. Eur Spine J 19, 1962 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1511-x

Available from: 2010-10-20 Created: 2021-08-10 Last updated: 2021-08-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Gellerstedt, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gellerstedt, Martin
In the same journal
European spine journal
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf