Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stochastic coherency in forecast reconciliation
Centre for Marketing Analytics and Forecasting, Department of Management Science, Lancaster University Management School, UK, United Kingdom.
Centre for Marketing Analytics and Forecasting, Department of Management Science, Lancaster University Management School, UK, United Kingdom.
University of Skövde, School of Informatics. University of Skövde, Informatics Research Environment. (Skövde Artificial Intelligence Lab (SAIL))ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0211-5218
2021 (English)In: International Journal of Production Economics, ISSN 0925-5273, E-ISSN 1873-7579, Vol. 240, article id 108221Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Hierarchical forecasting has been receiving increasing attention in the literature. The notion of coherency is central to this, which implies that the hierarchical time series follows some linear aggregation constraints. This notion, however, does not take several modelling uncertainties into account. We propose to redefine coherency as stochastic. This allows to accommodate overlooked uncertainties in forecast reconciliation. We show analytically that there are two potential sources of uncertainty in forecast reconciliation. We use simulated data to demonstrate how these uncertainties propagate to the covariance matrix estimation, introducing uncertainty in the reconciliation weights matrix. This then increases the uncertainty of the reconciled forecasts. We apply our understanding to modelling accident and emergency admissions in a UK hospital. Our analysis confirms the insights from stochastic coherency in forecast reconciliation. It shows that we gain accuracy improvement from forecast reconciliation, on average, at the cost of the variability of the forecast error distribution. Users may opt to prefer less volatile error distributions to assist decision making. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 240, article id 108221
Keywords [en]
Coherency, Covariance estimation, Forecast combination, Forecasting, Model uncertainty, Covariance matrix, Decision making, Stochastic models, Stochastic systems, Uncertainty analysis, Forecast combinations, Linear aggregation, Model uncertainties, Potential sources, Sources of uncertainty, Stochastics, Times series, Uncertainty
National Category
Probability Theory and Statistics
Research subject
Skövde Artificial Intelligence Lab (SAIL)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20256DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108221ISI: 000691546100003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85109968770OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-20256DiVA, id: diva2:1582607
Note

© 2021 Elsevier B.V.

Available from: 2021-08-02 Created: 2021-08-02 Last updated: 2021-10-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kourentzes, Nikolaos

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kourentzes, Nikolaos
By organisation
School of InformaticsInformatics Research Environment
In the same journal
International Journal of Production Economics
Probability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf