Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparison between remote and physically co-located, Plane and AR tag, as well as 2D and 3D supervision in a collaborative AR-environment
University of Skövde, School of Informatics.
University of Skövde, School of Informatics.
2021 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

As Covid-19 has been a long-lasting worldwide pandemic, more companies wish to find a solution in collaborative Augmented Reality (AR). That makes AR a growing technology that allows users to observe a virtual object in the real world in real-time. The virtual object can interact with real-world objects to fully augment the user’s reality. This paper's first aim is to evaluate whether a remote or aphysically co-located AR space is most efficient. The second aim concerns whether AR planes or AR tags will increase efficiency in the virtual environment. The third is to evaluate whether having a supervisor on a desktop with a mouse and keyboard and a screen or holding a phone connected to the same AR space is most efficient. The paper’s experiment’s focus will be to measure efficiency by fetching quantifiable data from the application while the pair of subjects complete the task of building a pyramid with cubes. Three paired t-tests have been done, one for each of the different test requirements. Co-located have been tested against remote, AR tag against AR plane, and 2D against 3D. The null hypothesis for these three tests is that there is no difference. A survey was done to collect qualitative data to determine which configuration was preferred. It was shown that co-located, 2D supervising, and AR planes were perceived as the best configuration.

The results of the paired t-tests show that the difference between co-located and remote is significant with a 99% accuracy. At the same time, the two other tests have an insignificant difference, even with a 95% accuracy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. , p. 29, iii
Keywords [en]
Augmented reality, collaboration, unity
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20101OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-20101DiVA, id: diva2:1576355
Subject / course
Informationsteknologi
Educational program
Computer Science - Specialization in Systems Development
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2021-06-30 Created: 2021-06-30 Last updated: 2021-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1711 kB)122 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1711 kBChecksum SHA-512
f6496369bc69250797123b089b90b35266cbfc491a33b204497b2b3f23291812761339c66c120f19d498ce1804288649554bdbd7b8332ff69ef8bfa9d6e76f83
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Informatics
Information Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 122 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 433 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf