Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Computational and accuracy benchmarking of simulation and system-theoretic models for production systems engineering
University of Skövde, School of Engineering Science.
2021 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The modern industry has an increasing demand for simulation software able to help workers and decision-makers visualize the outputs of a specific process in a fast, accurate way. In this report, a comparative study between FACTS (Factory Analyses in ConcepTual phase using Simulation), Plant Simulation, and PSE (Production System Engineering) Toolbox is done regarding their capacity to simulate models with increasing complexity, how accurate they are in their outputs with different optimized buffer allocations, and how well they perform on the task of detecting the bottlenecks of a process. Benchmarking simulation software requires an experimental approach, and for gathering and organizing all the data generated using external programs like MATLAB, C, Excel, and R are used.

A high level of automatization is required as otherwise the manual input of data would take too long to be effective.The results conclude on major concordances among FACTS and Plant Simulation as the most used commercial DES (Discrete Event Simulation) software and a more mathematical-theoretical approach coming from PSE Toolbox. The optimization done in the report links to sustainability, with an enhanced TH improving the ecological, social and economic aspects, and to Lean philosophy using lean buffers that smooth and improve the production flow.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. , p. xii, 64
Keywords [en]
DES, benchmarking, lean buffer, optimization, simulation software, performance measure, plant simulation, FACTS, PSE toolbox
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-19877OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-19877DiVA, id: diva2:1568674
Subject / course
Industrial Engineering
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2021-06-17 Created: 2021-06-17 Last updated: 2021-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4299 kB)175 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4299 kBChecksum SHA-512
ded914e45c22071c79aa51f55121d97b194064fb8daa742590d9ccc8186b846cbf20664e0e2c3ce57768f89cccaa725f6078f40e2e22ca3ba51d28ee27a36815
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Engineering Science
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 175 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 114 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf