Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stress and worry in the 2020 coronavirus pandemic: relationships to trust and compliance with preventive measures across 48 countries in the COVIDiSTRESS global survey
School of Culture and Society (Interacting Minds Center), Aarhus University, Denmark / Danish School of Education (DPU), Aarhus University, Denmark.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0214-5791
Hong Kong Institute of Education, Education University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong.
University of Bern, Switzerland.
Educational Psychology Program, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 1312021 (English)In: Royal Society Open Science, E-ISSN 2054-5703, Vol. 8, no 2, article id 200589Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The COVIDiSTRESS global survey collects data on early human responses to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic from 173 429 respondents in 48 countries. The open science study was co-designed by an international consortium of researchers to investigate how psychological responses differ across countries and cultures, and how this has impacted behaviour, coping and trust in government efforts to slow the spread of the virus. Starting in March 2020, COVIDiSTRESS leveraged the convenience of unpaid online recruitment to generate public data. The objective of the present analysis is to understand relationships between psychological responses in the early months of global coronavirus restrictions and help understand how different government measures succeed or fail in changing public behaviour. There were variations between and within countries. Although Western Europeans registered as more concerned over COVID-19, more stressed, and having slightly more trust in the governments' efforts, there was no clear geographical pattern in compliance with behavioural measures. Detailed plots illustrating between-countries differences are provided. Using both traditional and Bayesian analyses, we found that individuals who worried about getting sick worked harder to protect themselves and others. However, concern about the coronavirus itself did not account for all of the variances in experienced stress during the early months of COVID-19 restrictions. More alarmingly, such stress was associated with less compliance. Further, those most concerned over the coronavirus trusted in government measures primarily where policies were strict. While concern over a disease is a source of mental distress, other factors including strictness of protective measures, social support and personal lockdown conditions must also be taken into consideration to fully appreciate the psychological impact of COVID-19 and to understand why some people fail to follow behavioural guidelines intended to protect themselves and others from infection. The Stage 1 manuscript associated with this submission received in-principle acceptance (IPA) on 18 May 2020. Following IPA, the accepted Stage 1 version of the manuscript was preregistered on the Open Science Framework at https://osf.io/g2t3b. This preregistration was performed prior to data analysis.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
The Royal Society Publishing , 2021. Vol. 8, no 2, article id 200589
Keywords [en]
COVID-19, coronavirus, coronavirus pandemic, public health, stress, worry, trust, compliance
National Category
Psychology Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Research subject
Consciousness and Cognitive Neuroscience
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-19482DOI: 10.1098/rsos.200589ISI: 000672607700001PubMedID: 33972837Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85101321119OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-19482DiVA, id: diva2:1530063
Note

CC BY 4.0

I am part of the COVIDiStress Consortium. The full list of consortium authors can be found in the Supplementary files of the article: https://rs.figshare.com/articles/journal_contribution/Consortium_member_list_and_publication_co-contributor_statement_from_Stress_and_worry_in_the_2020_coronavirus_pandemic_relationships_to_trust_and_compliance_with_preventive_measures_across_48_countries_in_the_COVIDiSTRESS_global_survey/13708175?backTo=/collections/Supplementary_material_from_Stress_and_worry_in_the_2020_coronavirus_pandemic_relationships_to_trust_and_compliance_with_preventive_measures_across_48_countries_in_the_COVIDiSTRESS_global_survey_/5291225

Available from: 2021-02-21 Created: 2021-02-21 Last updated: 2022-12-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(849 kB)171 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 849 kBChecksum SHA-512
dda1ad476dd68aa5a065a325776759959e52d91a5da9d831a9caf2c513161cceba434e2e337f1a182a98aa65427593e2b93c08441f62367a780a0fa6be39d35c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusElectronic supplementary material

Authority records

Sikka, Pilleriin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lieberoth, AndreasSikka, Pilleriin
By organisation
School of BioscienceSystems Biology Research Environment
In the same journal
Royal Society Open Science
PsychologyPublic Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 171 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 326 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf