Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Benchmarks for evaluating human-robot interaction: lessons learned from human-animal interactions
University of Skövde, School of Informatics. University of Skövde, Informatics Research Environment. (Interaction Lab)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8937-8063
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. (Interaction Lab)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1177-4119
2020 (English)In: Proceedings of the 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN): Robots with Heart, Mind, and Soul, IEEE, 2020, p. 137-143Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Human-robot interaction (HRI) is fundamentally concerned with studying the interaction between humans and robots. While it is still a relatively young field, it can draw inspiration from other disciplines studying human interaction with other types of agents. Often, such inspiration is sought from the study of human-computer interaction (HCI) and the social sciences studying human-human interaction (HHI). More rarely, the field also turns to human-animal interaction (HAI).

In this paper, we identify two distinct underlying motivations for making such comparisons: to form a target to recreate orto obtain a benchmark (or baseline) for evaluation. We further highlight relevant (existing) overlap between HRI and HAI, and identify specific themes that are of particular interest for further trans-disciplinary exploration. At the same time, since robots and animals are clearly not the same, we also discuss important differences between HRI and HAI, their complementarity notwithstanding. The overall purpose of this discussion is thus to create an awareness of the potential mutual benefit between the two disciplines and to describe opportunities that exist for future work, both in terms of new domains to explore, and existing results to learn from.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEEE, 2020. p. 137-143
Series
IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication proceedings, ISSN 1944-9445, E-ISSN 1944-9437 ; 29
National Category
Interaction Technologies Robotics
Research subject
Interaction Lab (ILAB)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-19188DOI: 10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223347ISI: 000598571700021Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85095758350ISBN: 978-1-7281-6076-4 (print)ISBN: 978-1-7281-6075-7 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-19188DiVA, id: diva2:1477092
Conference
29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), August 31 - September 4, 2020 Virtual Conference
Note

IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (ROMAN)

Available from: 2020-10-16 Created: 2020-10-16 Last updated: 2024-01-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Lagerstedt, ErikThill, Serge

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lagerstedt, ErikThill, Serge
By organisation
School of InformaticsInformatics Research Environment
Interaction TechnologiesRobotics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 252 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf