Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Caesarean delivery rates and analgesia effectiveness following injections of sterile water for back pain in labour: A multicentre, randomised placebo controlled trial
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University Of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia / Mater Research Institute and School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Australia.
Molly Wardaguga Research Centre, Charles Darwin University, Brisbane, Australia / Mater Research Institute and School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Australia.
Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, United Kingdom / Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
University of Skövde, School of Health Sciences. University of Skövde, Digital Health Research (DHEAR). (Kvinna, barn, ungdom och familj (WomFam), Woman, Child, Youth and Family)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0079-3966
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: eClinicalMedicine, E-ISSN 2589-5370, Vol. 25, article id 100447Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

About a third of women experience severe back pain during labour. Injecting small volumes of intracutaneous sterile water into the lumbar region can be used to relieve this pain, however the procedure is controversial and previous reviews call for high quality trials to establish efficacy. We evaluated the impact on birth outcomes and analgesic effects of sterile water injections.

Methods

A multicentre, double-blind trial undertaken between December 2012 and December 2017 in one British and 15 Australian maternity units. Women experiencing severe back-pain in labour were assigned (1:1) by an independently generated randomisation schedule stratified by site to injections of either sterile water or saline placebo. Participants and caregivers were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was caesarean delivery rate. Main secondary outcomes included at least 30% or 50% reduction in self-reported pain scores at 30, 60 and 90 minutes after treatment. Intention to treat analysis were used and the level of significance for the multiple clinical outcomes was set at p<0.001 with the Bonferroni correction applied. The study is registered with the ACTRN Registry number, ACTRN1261100022195

Findings

Between December 9, 2012, and December 15, 2017, 1166 women were recruited and randomised: 587 women received sterile water injections (SWI) and 579 a saline placebo. Seven women in the SWI group and 12 in the placebo group were excluded as consent was not completed, leaving 580 and 567, respectively, included in the analysis. The proportions of caesarean delivery were 17·1% (82 of 580) in the SWI group and 14·8% (82 of 567) in the placebo (RR 1·16, 95% CI 0·88–1.51; p = 0·293). At 30 min post treatment 60·8% (330 of 543) of women in the SWI group reported a 30% reduction in self-reported pain compared to 31·4% (163 of 520) placebo (RR 1·94, 95% CI 1·68–2·24; p=<0·001) and 43·3% (235 of 534) SWI reported a 50% reduction versus 18·1% (94 of 520) placebo (RR 2·39, 95% CI 1·95–2·94; p=<0·001). The analgesic effect of SWI compared to placebo remained significant at 60 and 90 min post-treatment. There were no significant differences in other maternal or neonatal outcomes.

Interpretation

Compared to placebo, injections of sterile water did not reduce rates of caesarean delivery. For the main secondary outcome of pain relief the intervention did result in significantly more women reporting at least 30% and 50% reduction in pain for up to 90 min. Water injections have no effect on birth outcomes though can be an effective treatment for the relief of labour-related back pain.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 25, article id 100447
Keywords [en]
Randomised controlled trial, Back pain, Labour, Caesarean section, Sterile water injections, Obstetrics
National Category
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Research subject
Woman, Child and Family (WomFam)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-18801DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100447ISI: 000645914700004PubMedID: 32954233Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85090046838OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-18801DiVA, id: diva2:1452879
Note

Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council. CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Available from: 2020-07-08 Created: 2020-07-08 Last updated: 2023-07-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(617 kB)204 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 617 kBChecksum SHA-512
5e50eadd81928d54b50afed17cba34c7311ee72c83b09ca3ca8913f98b7411a9248fd3c032a29616830329ff8f9bf59dd2aae8b03cdc3bb58cd9f5d49eb59deb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mårtensson, Lena B.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mårtensson, Lena B.
By organisation
School of Health SciencesDigital Health Research (DHEAR)
In the same journal
eClinicalMedicine
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 253 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 336 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf