An anticipatory ethical analysis of offensive cyberspace operations
2020 (English)In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, ICCWS 2020 / [ed] Brian K. Payne, Hongyi Wu, Reading: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, 2020, p. 512-520Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]
This article presents the ethical issues using offensive cyberspace operations. Previously enshrouded in secrecy, and now becoming the new norm, countries are using offensive cyberspace operations to achieve their strategic interests. Russia has conducted multiple offensive operations targeting Estonia, Georgia and the Ukraine; Hamas has targeted Israeli targets; and Iran has been targeting U.S. targets. The response to these operations has varied; Estonia and Georgia struggled with the attacks and were unable to respond while Ukraine tried to respond but the response was inefficient. Israel's response on Hamas offensive operations was an air strike on a building with Hamas Cyber-operatives. Iran shot down a U.S. Drone over the Strait of Hormuz, and the U.S. initially intended to respond with kinetic capabilities in the form of missile strikes. However, in the last minute, the U.S. chose to respond with offensive cyberspace operations targeting the Iranian missile systems. This last-minute change of response choosing between kinetic or cyber capabilities shows a need to further investigate how offensive cyberspace operations can be used against which targets from an ethical perspective. This article applies anticipatory ethical analysis on U.S. offensive operations in the “Global Hawk”-case when Iran shot down a U.S. drone over the Strait of Hormuz. Anticipatory ethical analysis looks at emerging technologies and their potential consequences. Offensive cyberspace operations present a range of possibilities, which include lowering the risk of harm to cyber operatives' lives belonging to the responding nation. However, a response can also be kinetic. Therefore, the analysis of the “Global Hawk”-case is compared with the Israeli-air strike of the building of Hamas Cyber-operatives. The authors argue that applying anticipatory ethical analysis on offensive operations and kinetic operations assist decision makers in choosing response actions to re-establish deterrence through the use of offensive cyberspace operations.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Reading: Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited, 2020. p. 512-520
Series
Proceedings of the International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, ISSN 2048-9870, E-ISSN 2048-9889
Keywords [en]
Anticipatory Ethics, Deterrence, Kinetic, Offensive Cyberspace Operations, Response, Computer crime, Decision making, Drones, Kinetics, Missiles, Philosophical aspects, Decision makers, Emerging technologies, Ethical issues, Ethical perspectives, Missile strike, Missile systems, Offensive operations, Strategic interest, Computers
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Information Systems Information Systems, Social aspects Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Research subject
Information Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-18419ISI: 000560067200060Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85083363637ISBN: 978-1-912764-52-5 (print)ISBN: 978-1-912764-53-2 (electronic)ISBN: 1-912764-53-9 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-18419DiVA, id: diva2:1427664
Conference
15th International Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security, ICCWS 2020, Norfolk, United States, 12 March 2020 through 13 March 2020, Code 158670
Note
10.34190/ICCWS.20.054
2020-04-302020-04-302020-12-29Bibliographically approved