his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Analysis of two visual odometry systems for use in an agricultural field environment
University of Skövde, School of Engineering Science. University of Skövde, The Virtual Systems Research Centre. (Produktion och automatiseringsteknik, Production and Automation Engineering)
School of Information Science, Computer and Electrical Engineering, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
2018 (English)In: Biosystems Engineering, ISSN 1537-5110, E-ISSN 1537-5129, Vol. 166, p. 116-125Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper analyses two visual odometry systems for use in an agricultural field environment. The impact of various design parameters and camera setups are evaluated in a simulation environment. Four real field experiments were conducted using a mobile robot operating in an agricultural field. The robot was controlled to travel in a regular back-and-forth pattern with headland turns. The experimental runs were 1.8–3.1 km long and consisted of 32–63,000 frames. The results indicate that a camera angle of 75° gives the best results with the least error. An increased camera resolution only improves the result slightly. The algorithm must be able to reduce error accumulation by adapting the frame rate to minimise error. The results also illustrate the difficulties of estimating roll and pitch using a downward-facing camera. The best results for full 6-DOF position estimation were obtained on a 1.8-km run using 6680 frames captured from the forward-facing cameras. The translation error (x,y,z) is 3.76% and the rotational error (i.e., roll, pitch, and yaw) is 0.0482 deg m−1. The main contributions of this paper are an analysis of design option impacts on visual odometry results and a comparison of two state-of-the-art visual odometry algorithms, applied to agricultural field data.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2018. Vol. 166, p. 116-125
Keywords [en]
Visual odometry, Agricultural field robots, Visual navigation
National Category
Robotics
Research subject
Production and Automation Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-14585DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.11.009ISI: 000424726400009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85037985130OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-14585DiVA, id: diva2:1166554
Available from: 2017-12-15 Created: 2017-12-15 Last updated: 2018-03-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

The full text will be freely available from 2020-03-01 00:01
Available from 2020-03-01 00:01

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Ericson, Stefan K.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ericson, Stefan K.
By organisation
School of Engineering ScienceThe Virtual Systems Research Centre
In the same journal
Biosystems Engineering
Robotics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 83 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf