Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of System Performance During DDoS Attacks in Modern Operating Systems
University of Skövde, School of Informatics.
2017 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 15 credits / 22,5 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Distributed Denial of Service attacks are an ever prevalent challenge for system administra-tors today to overcome. The attack, which is all about restricting legitimate users access to a service, such as a web-page. Can cost companies and governments millions of dollars if not properly managed.

This study aims to explore if there is any difference in performance between some of the most modern iterations of popular server operating systems today. Those server operating systems are: Windows Server 2016, Ubuntu 16 and FreeBSD 11. And submitting them to one of the most popular DDoS attacks at the time of writing, a so called HTTP-Get request. The webservers used are some of the most widely used today, Apache and Microsoft IIS.

Each server will be submitted to attacks, and compared between one another. Different de-fence methods will also be tested and examined. Tests include shorter tests that is repeated multiple times for data validity, and one longer test for every condition in order to control if the results are similar. During these tests, the operating systems will measure CPU/RAM utilization, and a control computer will measure Round Trip Time.

Windows Server 2016 using IIS and FreeBSD 11 perform similarly resource wise, but Win-dows Server 2016 with IIS had a better Round Trip Time performance. Windows Server 2016 with Apache performs worst in all measurements, while Ubuntu 16 performs in the middle, but has the most stable performance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , p. 27
Keywords [en]
DDoS, DDoS Prevention, Windows Server 2016, Ubuntu 16, FreeBSD 11, HTTP-Get, IP-Thresholding, Load-Balancing
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13748OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-13748DiVA, id: diva2:1111149
Subject / course
Informationsteknologi
Educational program
Network and Systems Administration
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2017-06-19 Created: 2017-06-17 Last updated: 2018-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1524 kB)4407 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1524 kBChecksum SHA-512
79c1936cf48ca319a9d65a06adcdd9c31381d8fa11a66c4d2e88559ac6bc22f505f60ea943421a7c7bf61693ca0f5cd7a509524f8b3ec51ce652a119e1179443
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pettersson, Erik
By organisation
School of Informatics
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 4408 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 5509 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf