his.sePublikationer
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A New Look at Individual Differences in Perceptions of Unfairness: The Theory of Maximally Unfair Allocations in Multiparty Situations
School of Education, Culture and Communication, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.
Högskolan i Skövde, Institutionen för hälsa och lärande. Högskolan i Skövde, Forskningsspecialiseringen Hälsa och Lärande. (Kvinna, barn och familj (WomFam), Woman, Child and Family)ORCID-id: 0000-0001-7164-0433
ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: Social Justice Research, ISSN 0885-7466, E-ISSN 1573-6725, Vol. 28, nr 4, s. 401-414Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Previous research has demonstrated that unfairness judgments of resource allocations become more complex when there are more than two recipients. In order to explain some of this complexity, we propose a set of psychological mechanisms that may underlie four different choices of maximally unfair resource allocations (MUA): Self-Single-Loser, Self-One-Loser-of-Many, Self-Single-Winner, and Self-One-Winner-of-Many. From this psychological theory, several predictions are derived and tested in vignette studies involving a total of 708 participants recruited online using MTurk. As predicted by our theory, (1) choices of MUA where there is a single loser were much more common when the allocated resource was of negative rather than positive valence, and (2) the amount of egoistic bias individuals exhibited when judging the unfairness in receiving a small rather than a large share in a non-extreme multi-party allocation was predicted by their choices of MUA. These findings suggest that an individual’s choice of MUA reveals some generally relevant principles of how unfairness is perceived in multi-party allocations. This opens up new lines of inquiry, especially regarding research on social dilemmas and social value orientation.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
New York: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2015. Vol. 28, nr 4, s. 401-414
Nyckelord [en]
Unfairness, Distributive justice, Inequality, Multi-party allocation, Egoistic bias
Nationell ämneskategori
Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi) Socialpsykologi
Forskningsämne
Kvinna, barn och familj (WomFam)
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-12122DOI: 10.1007/s11211-015-0255-5ISI: 000365744900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84948578049OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-12122DiVA, id: diva2:920980
Tillgänglig från: 2016-04-19 Skapad: 2016-04-08 Senast uppdaterad: 2020-01-21Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Personposter BETA

Kazemi, AliTörnblom, Kjell

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Kazemi, AliTörnblom, Kjell
Av organisationen
Institutionen för hälsa och lärandeForskningsspecialiseringen Hälsa och Lärande
I samma tidskrift
Social Justice Research
Psykologi (exklusive tillämpad psykologi)Socialpsykologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 815 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf