his.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of the PainMatcher and the Visual Analogue Scale for assessment of labour pain following administered pain relief treatment
Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-9771-6640
Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology/Endocrinology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg.
Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg.
Högskolan i Skövde, Institutionen för vård och natur.
2011 (engelsk)Inngår i: Midwifery, ISSN 0266-6138, E-ISSN 1532-3099, Vol. 27, nr 1, s. E134-E139Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: during childbirth, it is necessary to assess and monitor experienced pain and to evaluate the effect of pain relief treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the PainMatcher® (PM) with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for the assessment of labour pain and the effect of pain relief treatment.Design: randomised controlled trial.Setting: labour ward with approximately 2500 childbirths per year in western Sweden.Participants: 57 women with labour pain treated with acupuncture or sterile water injections scored their electrical pain threshold and pain intensity with the PM. Pain intensity was also assessed with the VAS. Electrical pain threshold and pain intensity were assessed immediately after a uterine contraction before and 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 minutes after treatment.Measurements and findings: the results showed a weak correlation (r=0.13, p<0.05) between the pain intensity scores on the PM and the VAS. The PM detected changes (decrease) in pain intensity to a lower degree than the VAS. Surprisingly, in over 10% of sessions, women scored their pain intensity during a uterine contraction lower than their electrical pain threshold with the PM. However, electrical pain thresholds with the PM correlated well throughout all measurements.Conclusions: the PM is a reliable tool for the assessment of electrical pain threshold; however, the VAS is more sensitive than the PM for recording changes in pain intensity when assessing the effects of treatment on labour pain.Implications for practice: the PM and the VAS are not interchangeable in the case of labour pain, and there is still a need for research in this area to find a more suitable assessment instrument for the evaluation of labour pain.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2011. Vol. 27, nr 1, s. E134-E139
Emneord [en]
Pain assessment, Visual Analogue Scale, PainMatcher, Labour pain
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Medicin
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-3280DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2009.03.004ISI: 000286621700003PubMedID: 19501433Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-79151470527OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-3280DiVA, id: diva2:227027
Tilgjengelig fra: 2009-07-08 Laget: 2009-07-08 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-13bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Personposter BETA

Bergh, Ingrid H. E.Mårtensson, Lena

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Bergh, Ingrid H. E.Mårtensson, Lena
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Midwifery

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1743 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf