Högskolan i Skövde

his.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Do elite soccer players cover less distance when their team spent more time in possession of the ball?
Faculty of Educacion and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5545-8890
Faculty of Educacion and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8519-6596
Faculty of Educacion and Sport Sciences, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4770-2694
Department of Competitions and Mediacoah, LaLiga, Madrid, Spain.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9286-6113
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Science and medicine in football, ISSN 2473-3938, E-ISSN 2473-4446, Vol. 5, no 4, p. 310-316Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the association between the time spent in possession by teams and the match-running performance in elite soccer matches.

Methods: Match performance data were collected from players in Spanish LaLiga (8,468 individual match observations of 412 outfield players) using a multiple-camera computerised tracking system. A k-means cluster analyses classified teams depending on time spent in possession of the ball: very high-percentage ball possession teams (VHPBPT), high-percentage ball possession teams (HPBPT), low-percentage ball possession teams (LPBPT) and very low-percentage ball possession teams (VLPBPT).

Results: Overall, physical indicators were highly associated with ball possession. Distances covered in VHPBPT were lower than HPBPT, LPBPT and VLPBPT, especially at low and medium speed. Position-specific changes were also evident for physical profiles. Attackers (central midfielders, external midfielders and forwards) in VHPBPT covered fewer meters per minute at any speed than their counterparts in HPBPT, LPBPT or VLPBPT. However, defenders (Central defenders and External defenders) in VLPBPT covered lower distances.

Conclusion: These findings may have a great deal of practical implications and may help coaches to better understand match-running variations according to ball possession strategies and could be used to develop a model for predicting the physical activity profile in competition.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2021. Vol. 5, no 4, p. 310-316
Keywords [en]
Ball possession, playing position, match-running performance, football
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-20756DOI: 10.1080/24733938.2020.1853211ISI: 000596652100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85097058947OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-20756DiVA, id: diva2:1616057
Available from: 2021-12-01 Created: 2021-12-01 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Kalén, Anton

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lorenzo-Martinez, MiguelKalén, AntonRey, EzequielLópez-Del Campo, RobertoLago-Peñas, Carlos
In the same journal
Science and medicine in football
Sport and Fitness Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 69 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-cv
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf