his.sePublikasjoner
Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hospital management from a high reliability organizational change perspective: A Swedish case on Lean and Six Sigma
Högskolan i Skövde, Institutionen för handel och företagande. Högskolan i Skövde, Forskningsspecialiseringen Framtidens Företagande. (Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens, Followership and Organizational Resilience (FORE))ORCID-id: 0000-0001-5718-0100
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: International Journal of Public Sector Management, ISSN 0951-3558, E-ISSN 1758-6666, Vol. 30, nr 1, s. 67-84Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyze nurses’ perceptions and evaluations of healthcare developmental work after the introduction of Lean and Six Sigma and, how nurses aspire to maintain a high reliability organization (HRO).

Design/methodology/approach – Nurses’ roles and the way they respond to new efficiency and quality working methods are crucial. Underlying themes were analyzed from in-depth, semi-structured interviews with (n 17) nurses at two Swedish hospitals.

Findings – The nurses perceived that Lean worked better than Six Sigma, because of its bottom-up approach, and its similarities with nurses’ well-known work qualities. Nurses coordinate patients care, collaborate in teams and take leadership roles. To maintain high reliability and to become quality developers, nurses need stable resources. However, professional’s logic collides with management’s logic. Expert knowledge (top-down approach) without nurses’ local knowledge (bottom-up approach) can lead to problems. Healthcare quality methods are standardized but must be used with flexibility. However, HROs ensue not only from method quality but also from work attitudes, commitment and continuous work-improvement.

Practical implications – Management can support personnel in developmental work with: continuous education, training, teamwork, knowledge sharing and cooperation. Authoritarian method structures that limit the healthcare professionals’ autonomy should be softened or abandoned.

Originality/value – The study uses theoretical concepts from HROs, which were developed for unexpected events, to explain the consequences of implementing Lean and Six Sigma in healthcare.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2017. Vol. 30, nr 1, s. 67-84
Emneord [en]
Six Sigma, Lean, Nurses, Healthcare development, High reliable organizations
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Humaniora-samhällsvetenskap; Medarbetarskap och organisatorisk resiliens (FORE)
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:his:diva-13294DOI: 10.1108/IJPSM-12-2015-0221ISI: 000395672200005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85008196721OAI: oai:DiVA.org:his-13294DiVA, id: diva2:1061954
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-01-04 Laget: 2017-01-04 Sist oppdatert: 2017-11-27bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Eriksson, Nomie

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Eriksson, Nomie
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
International Journal of Public Sector Management

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 358 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf